Umed Singh v. Union Of India and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the statement of the petitioner's counsel. Any interim order stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Imm
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the statement of the petitioner's counsel. Any interim order stands vacated.
Imm
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No.334 of 2014
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate present for the petitioner has made a statement at bar that he wants to withdraw this writ petition.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 14.03.2014
JKJ
Petitioner
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court