Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as Counsel stated lack of instruction at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No. 292 of 2009
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. J.C. Pandey, Advocate, who was earlier counsel in this case has made a categorical statement at the bar that he has no instruction in the matter.
In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 10.11.2014
Ankit
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
