Petitioner's counsel stated grievance was redressed during pendency. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No.1641 of 2014 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. A.M. Saklani, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that during the pendency of present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondents. Hence, the present writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the above statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 07.11.2014
JKJ
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
