Dismissed
Naveen Chandra Pandey v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/1847/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1847 of 2014
Naveen Chandra Pandey ……….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….… Respondents
Present: Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
2
No.1204 (S/S) of 2014, Badri Singh Bhainsora Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others, shall follow in the present writ petition.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 11.11.2014
Nitesh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the relief granted in a similar decision regarding renaming of posts and framework of appointments.
Whether the change in nomenclature from Coordinators to Cluster/Block Resource Persons affects the petitioner's substantive rights.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Badri Singh Bhainsora Vs. State of Uttarakhand & othersFollowed¶7
Writ Petition No.1204 (S/S) of 2014, Badri Singh Bhainsora Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others
Naveen Chandra Pandey
State of Uttarakhand
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court