A vacation judge disposed of a writ petition seeking maternity leave on equal terms for regular employees, noting it was squarely covered by a coordinate bench judgment. Urgency and stay applications were also disposed of.
Matters disposed of at the threshold with directions given in a prior coordinate bench judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Civil Misc. Writ Petition (S/S) No. 155 of 2014
Smt. Saroj Lakra
.....….…… Petitioner
versus
State of Uttarakhand and another ..……. Respondents
Mr. Alok Dalakoti, Advocate, present for the writ petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyaya, Chief Standing Counsel, present for the respondent no.1 & 2.
U.C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner, by means present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to sanction the maternity leave for the period which she went on maternity leave, to the petitioner on the same terms and conditions which the regular employees are getting.
2
Hon’ble Bench of this Court on 08.07.2013 in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 826 of 2012.
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) Vacation Judge Dated: 04.02.2014
Kaushal
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether maternity leave is payable to the petitioner on the same terms and conditions as regular employees.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Indu Joshi vs. State of Uttarakhand and othersFollowed¶10
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 826 of 2012, Smt. Indu Joshi vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, 08.07.2013
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Saroj Lakra
State of Uttarakhand
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
