Jafar v. State Of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original…
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 28th day of May, 2014 Ist Bail Application No. 589 of 2014
Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE
Jafar …… Applicant Versus
State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party
Mr. Mohd. Allauddin, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P.S. Saun, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Brief Holder for the respondent State.
U.C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Jafar, who is in jail in connection with case crime no. 84 of 2014, in respect of offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 IPC, relating to police station, Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the documents on record and considered the grounds taken up in the bail application.
Co-accused Mahboob and Wasim alias Chota, with similar role, were earlier granted bail by this Court, vide orders dated 01.05.2014 and 09.05.2014. Present applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 25.03.2014. Considering the facts and circumstances, a case for bail is made out in favour of the present applicant on the ground of parity.
The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Roorkee.
( U.C. Dhyani, J. )
Dt. May 28, 2014.
Negi
Jafar
State of Uttarakhand
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court