Sanjay Saini v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was withdrawn by the applicant as permitted by counsel. The Court dismissed the application consequentially. No substantive ruling is recorded.
The bail application was withdrawn by the applicant as permitted by counsel. The Court dismissed the application consequentially. No substantive ruling is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA-III-3 OF 2013
U. C. Dhyani, J.
Ms. Nishat Intezar, Advocate present for the applicant.
Mr. P. S. Soan, Deputy Advocate General present for the State.
As prayed, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to withdraw the bail application.
Bail Application is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.)
Dated 27.05.2014
Rawat
Applicant
State
U. C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court