Writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner did not press the case. The respondent was granted liberty to file a fresh petition before the appropriate forum.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPMS No. 439 of 2013 Hon’ble Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.
Mr. R.K. Raizada, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Bisht, Advocate for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition in present form. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not being pressed. However, liberty is given to take out a fresh one before the appropriate forum as may be advised.
(K.J. Sengupta, J.)
Dated 08.03.2013 Shiv
Petitioner
Respondents
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
