The single judge dismissed the writ petition by relying on a previous judgment dated 17.12.2013 in similar matter WPMS No. 34 of 2012, disposing of the petition in same terms without order as to costs.
disposed of in same terms and conditions as in WPMS No. 34 of 2012. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 15 of 2013
Ram Pal & others
… Petitioners
Vs
State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents
Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, present for the petitioners
Mr. T.A. Khan, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Additional C.S.C., present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu, J. (Oral)
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
28.12.2013
Aswal
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
similar matter being WPMS No. 34 of 2012Followed¶9
WPMS No. 34 of 2012
Ram Pal & others
State of Uttarakhand & others
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
