The grant stated that the order in a special appeal was complied with by the respondents during the pendency of the contempt petition, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged.
Contempt petition dismissed; notices issued to respondents discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CLCON No.212 of 2013 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mrs. Beena Pandey, Standing counsel present for the State of U.P. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that during the pendency of the contempt petition, order dated 18.03.2013 of this Court passed in Special Appeal No.432 of 2012 “Pawan Kumar Boara and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others” (of which wilfully disobedience was alleged), has now been complied with by the respondents. In view of the above statement, the contempt petition is dismissed and notices issued to respondents are hereby discharged.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 26.12.2013
JKJ
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Uttarakhand and othersReferred¶2
Pawan Kumar Boara and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others
Petitioners
Respondents
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
