Allowed
Shyam Singh v. State Of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBA1/895/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction 1st Bail Application No. 895 of 2013
Order on the bail application of the accused.
Shyam Singh. …….Applicant (in Jail). Versus
State of Uttarakhand. …......…. Opposite Party.
Present:
Mr. Amish Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Rautela, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Alok Singh, J (Oral).
This is an application seeking regular bail in case crime No. 3 of 2013 under Section 304-B, 302, 498-A, 323 IPC, and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Chalani Thana - Patwari Kshetra Sahro, District Almora.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per post mortem report of Rekha (deceased), cause of death could not be ascertained and viscera report has yet not come suggesting poisoning. He, while placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Kuldeep Goyal Vs. State of Uttarakhand reported in 2013 (1) UD 612, submits that every untimely and young death cannot be said to be dowry death.
Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond of ` 50,000/- and two sureties, of the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Almora.
(Alok Singh, J.)
10.07.2013
SKS
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kuldeep Goyal Vs. State of UttarakhandRelied on¶9
2013 (1) UD 612
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shyam Singh
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court