Lakhendra Chauhan v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2005 (MB) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Hon’ble…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCrl No. 869 of 2005 (MB) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that the petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement advanced by leaned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed being infructuous.
03-03-2006 ASWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPMB/869/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court