Gulzar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Sections 420 IPC, the court granted bail to the applicant, who had been remand strained due to identity discrepancies corrected under Sections 83-84 Cr.P.C., by allowing a personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail via personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the Magistrate.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the July 4, 2006 Criminal Bail Application No. 570 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused
CRIMINAL SIDE
Gulzar S/o Sarafat R/o Village Bharapur Police Station Jawalapur District Haridwar
….Applicant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal
…Opposite Party
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Arising out of Case Crime No. 339 of 2003 Under Sections 420, of I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar
By the court
Hon'ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 339 of 2003 under Sections 420 of I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, having been arrested under Section 83/84 Cr.P.C. due to wrongly disclosed parentage and detained for two months, is entitled to bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gulzar S/o Sarafat
Coram
B.C. Kandpal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA1/570/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court