Kunwar Sen @ Kunwar Ji Rathour v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL…
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Bail Application No. 386/2006
Kunwar Sen @ Kunwar Ji Rathour S/o Balak Ram R/o Rudrapur Road Kichchha, P.S. Kichchha, District U. S. Nagar ………. Applicant. Vs.
State of Uttaranchal .. Respondent.
Arising out of case crime No. 737/2006. U/S 420 I.P.C. P.S. Kichchha, District Udham Singh Nagar
Hon'ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 737/2006, U/S 420 I.P.C. Police Station Kichchha, District Udham Singh Nagar.
Heard Sri H.M. Sethi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
The record reveals that the Chief Medical Officer, Udham Singh Nagar deputed the District Homeopathic Officer, Rudrapur to inspect the Institute titled as "Om Research Institute and Electropathy, Hospital, Rudrapur Road, Bangali Colony, Rudrapur. When the team reached over there, it came to know that the Institute was being run without having any authority either by the Government or by the Medical Council. The applicant posted himself to be the Director of the Institute, but at the same time he was found to be the student of that very Institute. The applicant also could not show any document maintained by the Institute with regard to the payment of the fee etc or the documents pertaining to the other affairs of the Institute. The inspecting team also could not get any of the teacher in the alleged College.
Having considered the aforesaid aspects, I am of the view that the applicant is involved in running the Institute without having any proper authority from either the State Government or the Medical Council. The applicant is thus involved in the serious social offence. I do not find any ground for enlarging the applicant on bail at this state.
The bail application is hereby rejected.
(B.C. Kandpal, J.)
Dated: 3-07-2006 ISB
Kunwar Sen @ Kunwar Ji Rathour
State of Uttaranchal
B.C. Kandpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court