Dismissed
Mohan Ram v. State
Uttarakhand HCBA1/119/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
119 of 2006 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Sri…
What the court decided
AI extract
119 of 2006 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Sri…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA1 No. 119 of 2006
Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Sri Kailash Joshi, learned counsel for the appliance has submitted that the trial before the court in now concluded, therefore, this application has become infructuous. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the applicant, this bail application has rendered infructuous and the same in dismissed as such.
(B.C. Kandpal J.)
Dt. 4.7.2006
B.C. Kandpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court