A writ petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed as not pressed to admit because the petitioner was instructed by counsel not to proceed after subsequent verification of facts revealed no ground for relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IA No1 of 2016 In REV PET No.32 of 2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Noting by Officer or Serial Date Advocate No |
Office notes, reports, orders or Proceedings with signature |
| T 01.11.2 |
BEFORE HE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA 017 |
| Mr. P. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that he has instruction not to press this petition as on subsequent verification of the facts it came to the knowledge of the petitioner that there is no ground for seeking of the judgment under reference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE |
Moumita
Page 1 of 1
Moumita and others
Respondent(s) not named
S. TALAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
