The High Court allowed the petition's withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same subject matter, noting formal defects in the original filing.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same subject matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| W.P.(C) No.1343 of 2017 | |
|---|---|
| Noting by Officer or Serial Date Advocate No |
Office notes, reports, orders or Proceedings with signature |
| T 31.10.2 |
BEFORE HE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA 017 Mr. A. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at the outset has submitted that there is some formal defects in the petition and he has instruction to withdraw this petition with liberty reserved to file a fresh petition on the same subject matter. Prayer stands allowed. This petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, however, liberty is reserved to approach the court on the same subject matter. JUDGE |
Moumita
Page 1 of 1
Moumita
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
