Adhir Ch. Das and Anr. v. the State of Tripura and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petition was not pressed by the senior counsel for the petitioners; the petition was dismissed.
The revision petition was not pressed by the senior counsel for the petitioners; the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP NO.07/2017
B E F O R E
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Present : For the petitioners : Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate. Mr. H. Laskar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. G.S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate. Mr. B. Datta, Advocate.
10.08.2017.
Heard Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. H. Laskar, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G.S. Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 and Mr. B. Datta, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
As the learned senior counsel does not wish to press this revision petition, the same stands dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
CRP NO.07/2017
Page 1 of 1
Petitioners
Respondents
Chief Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court