Dismissed
Rosana Begam v. the State of Tripura
Tripura HCCrl.Rev.P./38/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
P No.38 of 2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL REV P No.38…
What the court decided
AI extract
P No.38 of 2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL REV P No.38…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL REV P No.38 of 2017
B_E_F_O_R_E THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR T. VAIPHEI
Present :
For the petitioner : Ms. P. Sen, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. S. Sarkar, Public Prosecutor.
29.06.2017
Heard Ms. P. Sen, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Sarkar, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
As prayed for, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw this revision petition with a liberty to file a fresh case.
Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The certified copy will be returned to the petitioner.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dipesh
CRL REV P No.38 of 2017 Page 1 of 1
Petitioner
State
T. Vaipey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court