L.narasimha Reddy T.sunil Chowdary

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY Contempt Case No.1493 of 2014 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not comply with th

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and * THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY + I.T.T.A.No.244 of 2003 % 28.10.2014 #Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry. …. Appellant Vs. $ Grandhi Venkata Ramana, Rajahmundry. …. Respondent ! Counsel fo

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY I.T.T.A.No.241 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This appeal is directed against an order, dated 03.07.2001 passed by the Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tri

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND * THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY +I.T.T.A.No.196 of 2003 % Dated 28.10.2014 # Y.Ramachandra Reddy. ….Appellant $ Addl. CIT (Assts) SR-V, Hyderabad ….Respondent ! Counsel for the appellant : Sri A.

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY REFERRED CASE No. 64 OF 2002 24-10-2014 BETWEEN The Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka, Central, Bangalore …Applicant And Shri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd, Kakinada

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY + I.T.T.A No. 124 OF 2002 % Dated 10-10-2014 # Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Hyderabad …Appellant VERSUS $ Premier Explosive Ltd., 201, Minerva Complex, S.D. Road, Se

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY C.E.R.C.No.12 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This reference is made at the instance of the Department under Section 35 (H)(1) of the Central Excise Act, as it stood i

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY C.E.R.C.No.9 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This Central Excise Reference Case under Section 35(H)(1) of the Central Excise Act (for short ‘ the Act’), as it stood at

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY R.C.No.10 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This matter arises under the Gift Tax Act (for short ‘ the Act’). The applicant herein suffered an order before t h e Hyderab

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY I.T.T.A.No.44 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This appeal under Section 260- A of the Income Tax Act,1961 is filed by the Revenue feeling aggrieved by the order, dated

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.P.No.12484 of 2002 ORDER: (Per LNR,J) The writ petition was listed ‘for hearing’ on 23.09.2014. There was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it was d

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY I.T.T.A.No.91 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This appeal, at the instance of the Revenue, is preferred against the order, dated 19.11.2001, passed in I.T.A.No.696/Hyd

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.T.A.No.1 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The appeal was listed ‘for hearing’ on 23.09.2014. There was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, it was directed

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY C.E.R.C.No.21 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This reference is made at the instance of the Department under Section 35 (H)(1) of the Central Excise Act, as it stood i

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY C.E.R.C.No.20 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This reference is made at the instance of the Department under Section 35 (H)(1) of the Central Excise Act, as it stood i

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY I.T.C.No.2 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The I.T.C. was listed ‘for hearing’ on 23.09.2014. There was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it was directe

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA Nos. 125 AND 126 OF 2002 05-09-2014 BETWEEN Pothina Venkateswara Swamy …Appellant And Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada …..Responde

L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA No. 150 OF 2002 05-09-2014 BETWEEN Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad …Appellant And Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd., Hyderabad …..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA Nos. 125 AND 126 OF 2002 05-09-2014 BETWEEN Pothina Venkateswara Swamy …Appellant And Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada …..Responde

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY + WRIT APPEAL No. 1827 OF 2013 % Dated 14-08-2014 # APSRTC, rep., by its Depot Manager, Adilabad Depot, Adilabad District …Appellant VERSUS $ M.A. Basheer …..Responden

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.1092 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The appellant is employed as a Driver in the Eleswaram Depot of A.P.S.R.T.C., 1st respondent herein. On 24.06.2014, he was

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.P.No.10598 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The writ petition was listed ‘for hearing’ on 12.08.2014. There was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it wa

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT APPEAL No.1096 OF 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This writ appeal is filed challenging the order, dated 18.07.2014, passed by the

SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.23593 of 2001 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The petitioners are small scale industries undertaking manufacture of parts of

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY R.C.No.63 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) This reference is made at the instance of the Revenue by the Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, by framing