A written appeal was dismissed for default as there was no representation to appear on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.T.A.No.1 of 2003
JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J)
The appeal was listed ‘for hearing’ on 23.09.2014. There was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, it was directed to be listed today ‘for dismissal’. There is no representation today also.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 24.09.2014 JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
W.T.A.No.1 of 2003
Date: 24.09.2014
JSU
L.NARASIMHA REDDY
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
