Cheggam Laxmi Narasamma Vs State of Telangana

¶1

[³³⁰¹ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETIT|ON NO: 27658 OF 2021

¶7

Between

¶8

cheggam Laxmi Narasamma,wlo Late sri_cheggam Jagannadha swamy, aged 6g years, occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o H.No. 2-139t3, Gindhinigar Villag", cr,rnpur (M) Revenue [Vlandal, Bhupalpally District.

¶9

AND

¶10

.....PETITIONER

¶11

state of Telangana, Rep.by its principal secretary-Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The District collector at Bhupalapally, Bhupalpally District.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional officer at Bhupalpally Division, J.S Bhupalpally District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Ghanpur (M) Revenue Mandal, Bhupalpally District.

¶15

.....RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents in not rectifying the duplicate entries the agriculture land of the petitioner an extent of Ac.1- 20 guntas, in Sy No. 18/5 situated in Burrakayalagudem Revenue Village, Ghanpur (M) Mandal, of Bhupalapally district as illegal, arbitrary and against the rights guaranteed by the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to conduct an enquiry regarding the illegal entries in the revenue records and forthwith submit a report before the Hon'ble Court.

¶17

NO:l OF 2

¶18

Petitiorr Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fikld in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to conduct enquiry regarding the illegal entries in the revenue records of the agriculture land of the petitioner in Sy.No. 18t5 situated in BurrakayalaguCem Revenue Village, Ghanpur (M) Mandal, of Bhupalapally district pending dispos;al of the above writ petition.

¶19

l.A.NO:2 O F 2.021

¶20

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondenl No.2 to 4 to consider representation dated 15.09.20221 of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for thre Petitioner : SRl. ANGOTHU NEHRU

¶22

Counsel for thre Respondents : AGP FOR REVENUE

¶23

The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER

¶24

...ffign.ffi;.

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶26

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK

WRTT N No. E oF 202r

9th MARCH,20/26

Between:

Cheggarn Laxmi Narsamma

¶31

...Petitioner

¶32

AND

¶33

State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal SecretaryRevenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and (3) others

¶34

.. Respondents

¶35

OR DER:

¶36

with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

¶37

Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in rectifying the duplicate entries in respect of the agricultural land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.1-20 guntas in survey No.18/5 situated at Burrakayalagudem Revenue Village, Ghanpur (M) Mandal, Bhupalapally District, the present writ Petition is filed.

¶38

?

¶39

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Governrnent Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

¶40

4l Le,arned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted a representation to respondent No.2District Collector on 15.O9.2O2L requesting to rectify the entries in the r6venue records in respect of the subject land. However, no action is taken thereon till date. Therefore, the learned counsel seeks indulgence of this Court and prays to direct respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner, within a stipulated period of time.

¶41

Lr:arned Government Pleader submits that respondent No.2 will pass necessary orders on the representation dated 15.09.2021, rn accordance with [aw, if some time is granted.

¶42

Having regard to the above made submissions, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioner on 15.09.2021 strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, with a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a cop,y of this order.

¶43

3

¶44

Miscellaneous petitions, if arry,^{pending shall stand}

¶45

closed. There shall be no order as to^costs.

¶46

SD/- P.C. SULEKHA D ASSISTANT REG

¶47

//TRUE COPY/

¶48

To