Dismissed¶43

M.Venkateshwarlu v. M.Shiva Prasad

Telangana HC6 Feb 2026CRP/636/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, C.R.P.No.636 of 2022, decided 06.02.2026 by Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy. Petitioner M.Venkateshwarlu (counsel Sri Deepak Misra) versus respondents M.Shiva Prasad and M. Chandra Sekhar (no representation). Revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging delay in proceedings in O.S.No.245 of 2021, VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Suit found already disposed of by judgment and decree dated 05.08.2025; cause in CRP held no longer surviving; CRP dismissed as infructuous without costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed. No precedent cited; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed. ¶43

M.Venkateshwarlu Vs M.Shiva Prasad — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

t³⁴⁸⁶ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 636 OF 2022

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of lfre- Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the delay in taking up further proceedings in the Suit in OS No.24512O21 on the file of the Vll Senior Civil Judge, Cig Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

M.Venkateshwarlu, S/o. late Shri M.Rama Swamy, aged about 75 years, resident of house bearing No.2-2-1671111N3, Ramakrishna Nagar, presently known as Tilak nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad

¶10

...Petitioner / Defendant No.1

¶11

AND

¶12

M.Shiva Prasad, S/o. M.Venkateshwarlu, Aged 48 years, resident of ll Floor in house Bearing No.2-2-1671111N3, Ramakrishna Nagar, presently known as Tilak nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad

¶13

... RespondenUPlaintiff

¶14

M. Chandra Sekhar, S/o. M.Venkateshwarlu, Aged 43 years, resident of 1787, Cassatt Drive, Tallahassee Florida-32317, USA-

¶15

(RespondenUD2 is not necessary party to the present CRP)

¶16

...RespondenUDefendant No.2

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DEEPAK MISRA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: _ _ _ _

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAI)

¶21

TttE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

C.R.P.No.636 of 2022

Date:06.02.2026

Betwecn:

M. Venkateshwarlu

,.. Petitioner

AIII)

M.Shiva Prasad and Other.

...Respondents

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the delay in taking rrp [Lrther proceedings in O.S.No.245 of 2021 on the file of

¶34

learned VII-Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶35

Heard Sri Deepak Misra, leamed counsel for the petitioner.

¶36

Thcrc is no representation on behalf ofthe respondents.

¶37

l. When the malrcr is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice olthe Cou( thar rhe suit in O.S.No.245 of 2021 on the file of learned VII-Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Cotrrt, Hyderabad has alrcady been disposed ol uldejudgment and decree dated 05.0g.2025.

¶38

¶39

¶40