Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit; during hearing it emerged that the suit itself had been disposed of by judgment and decree dated 10.12.2024. The High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAYOF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYSIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEVAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
CIVIL REVISIONPETITION NO: 1314OF 2022
Petition under Afticle227 of the constitutionof lndia aggrievedby the order dated 10/03/2022passed in l.A No.1218 of 2019 rn OS No.623 of 2018 on the fileof the lAdditional SeniorCivil Judge, LB Nagar, RangaReddy District'
Between:
It/. Srinivas Reddy. S/oNarsrmha Reddy Aged about 61 years'Occ' Business,R/oH.No.3-4445-l,PIotNo.5,OppSrilaxmiNarayanabhavan' L.B Nagar, Ranga ReddyDistrict,TelanganaState'
...Petitioner / DefendantNo.1
AND
...RespondenUPlaintiff
(Respondent. No.2 ts notnecessary partyin this Case)
...RESPONDENTNo.2/Defendant No'2
t.A. NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under section1 51 of cPC praying thatin the circumstancesstatedan the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the Highcourt may be pleasedto stay all further proceedingsin osNo.623 of 2018 on the file of the I Additional seniorcivil Judge, Ranga ReddyDistrict at L,B.Nagar' pending disposal of the aboveCRP'
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KISHAN RAO MATURI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI C HARI PREETH (NO REPRESENTATTON)
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY
C.R.P.No.l314 of 2022
Datel.}6.02.2026
Betwecn:
M.Srinivas Reddy.
... Petitioncr
AND
B.Jeevan and Another
.. . Respondents
ORDER:
'Ihis Civil Revision Petition is flled aggrieved by the order dated i0.03.2022passed in l.A No. l2l8 of 2019 in O.S.No.623ol 2018 on the file of learnedI-AdditionatSeniorCivil Judge,Ranga Reddy, L.B.Nagar
There is no representation onbchalfof the rcspondents.
2
learned l-Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy, L.B.Nagar hasalreadybeen dispose,l ol-vrr1e judgmcnt and decrce dated l().12.2024.
5 Acccrrrli,gll,, thrs Clivil I{evisio' petition is disrnissed as
inllLrctuoLrs. Ihcre shall bc no ordcr as to costs
Miscellaneous l)etitions, pending ilany, shall stand closed.
SD/- M,NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The I Additronal Senior CivilJudge, LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy Dtstrict 2. One CC to Sri KishanRaolVlaturi,Advocate [OPUC]
\I]K,'I'SIfr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0610212026
ORDER
CRP.No.1314 of 2022
Y oR IHE S l4
^
()
'l ,.r ' 1:J
*
,,.
lt .
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
\o6:qC"A &.*'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Srinivas Reddy
B. Jeevan
B. Gopal Swamy
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
