Dismissed

H.M. Ismail, v. Smt. Ahmedi Begum

Telangana HC6 Jan 2026CRP/4154/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed three civil revision petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 151 CPC. The court held that as the main civil suit had already been disposed of by the trial court, the revision petitions had become infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petitions were dismissed as infructuous since the main suit had been disposed of by the trial court.

H.M. Ismail, Vs Smt. Ahmedi Begum — Succession and Inheritance | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4150 4154 & 41 56 0F 2025

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4150 OF 2025:

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, against the Order dated 11-11-2025 passed in l.A.No. 1316/2025 in 0.S.No. 13 of 2020, on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge - Cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

H.M. lsmail, S/o. Not known to the plaintiff, aged about 60 years, Occ. Business. (Died).

¶10

Rizwan,, S/o. H.lril. lsmail, aged about 38 years, Occ. Business.

¶11

lrfan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 34^years, Occ. Business.

¶12

lmran, S/o. H.lV. Ismail, aged about 32 years, Occ. Business.

¶13

Adnan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 27^years, Occ. Business.

¶14

(The petitioners 2 to 5 are Rl/o. H. No. 6-20-1 16, Dubba, Nizamabad). These are the actual names of the L.R's of H.M. lsmail, but in the suit the names are shown as:

¶15

H.M. lsmail, S/o. Not known to the plaintiff, aged about 60 years, Occ. Business. (Died).

¶16

Riyan, , S/o. H.M. Ismail, aged about 38^years, Occ. Business.

¶17

Rizwan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 34^years, Occ. Business.

¶18

lmran, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 32^years, Occ. Business.

¶19

Ameer, S/o. H.l/. lsmail, aged about 27^years, Occ. Business.

¶20

PETITIONERS

¶21

AND

¶22

1 Smt. Ahmedi Begum, Wo. Abdul Hameed, aged about 56^years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 8-15117214, Ramnagar Village and Mandal, Nizamabad. (Died).

¶23

M.A. Abdul Azmath, S/o. M.A. Hameed, aged about 43^years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. B-151172, Ramnagar, Gundaram Mandal, Nizamabad.

¶24

lshaq Ahmed, S/o. M A. Hameed, aged about 3'1^years, Occ. Business, R:/o. H. No. 16-2-835/D/1 , Flat No. 109, Sankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Banglaguda. Hyderabad.

¶25

(The respondents 2 and 3 are the L.R's of the respondent No. 1)

¶26

RESPONDENTS

¶27

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶28

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in O. S. No. 13 ot 2O20 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad, pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶29

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4154 OF 2025

¶30

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, against the Order dated'1 111112025 passed in l.A.No. 1315/2025 in O.S.No. 13o'f 2O2O onthefileof the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge - Cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad.

¶31

Between

¶32

H.M. lsmail,, S/o. Not known to the plaintiff, aged about 60 years, Occ Business. (Died).

¶33

Rizwan,, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 38 years, Occ. Business.

¶34

lrfan,, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 34 years, Occ. Business.

¶35

lmran,, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 32 years, Occ. Business.

¶36

Adnan,, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 27 years, Occ. Business.

¶37

(The petitioners 2 to 5 are R/o. H. No. 6-20- 1 1 6, Dubba, Nizamabad)

¶38

These are the actual names of the L.R's of H.M. lsmail, but in the suit the names are shown as:

¶39

H.fU. lsmail, S/o. Not known to the plaintiff, aged about 60 years, Occ. Business. (Died).

¶40

Riyan, , S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 38 years, Occ. Business.

¶41

Rizwan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 34 years, Occ. Business.

¶42

lmran, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 32 years, Occ. Business.

¶43

Ameer, S/o. H.M. lsmail, aged about 27 years, Occ. Business.

¶44

PETITIONERS

¶45

AND

¶46

Smt. Ahmedi Begum,, Wio. Abdul Hameed, aged about 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H. No. B-15117214, RamnagarVillage and Mandal, Nizamabad. (Died).

¶47

M.A. Abdul Azmath,, Sio. M.A. Hameed, aged about 43 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No. 8-151172, Ramnagar, Gundaram Mandal, Nizamabad.

¶48

lshaq Ahmed,, S/o. M.A. Hameed, aged about 31 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 16-2-B35lDl1 ,Flat No. 109, Sankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Banglaguda, Hyderabad.

¶49

(The respondents 2 and 3 are the L.R's of the respondent No,^'1)

¶50

RESPONDENTS

¶51

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶52

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in O.S.No. 13 of 2020 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge -Cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad, pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶53

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4156 OF 2025:,

¶54

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, against the Order daled 1111112025 passed in l.A.No. 131712025 in O.S.No. 13 o'f 2020, on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge - Cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad.

¶55

Between:

¶56

H.M. lsmail (Died), S/o. Not Known to the Plaintiff, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No. 6-20-116, Dubba, Nizamabad.

¶57

Rizwan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, Aged about 38 years, Occ, Business, Rl/o. H. No. 6- 2O-1 16, Dubba, Nizamabad.

¶58

lrfan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, Aged about 34^years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No.6-201 16, Dubba, Nizamabad.

¶59

lmran, S/o. H.lV. lsmail, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. H. No. 6- 20-1 16, Dubba, Nizamabad.

¶60

Adnan, S/o. H.tr/. lsmail, Aged aboul2T years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. H. No. 6- 2O-1 16, Dubba, Nizamabad.

¶61

These are the actual names of the L.Rs of H.M. lsmail, but in the suit the names are shown as:

¶62

H.M. lsmail, S/o. Not Known to the Plaintiff, Aged about 60^years, Occ Business. (Died).

¶63

Riyan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business.

¶64

Rizwan, S/o. H.M. lsmail, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business.

¶65

lmran, S/o. H.lr/. lsmail, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business.

¶66

Ameer, S/o. H.tM. lsmail, Aged aboul2T years, Occ. Business.

¶67

PETITIONERS

¶68

AND

¶69

Smt. Ahmedi Begum (Died), W/o. Abdul Hameed, Aged about 56 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H. No.8-15117214, RamnagarVillage and Mandal, Niza ma bad.

¶70

M.A. Abdul Azmath, S/o. M.A. Hameed, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Business, RJo. H. No. B-151172, Ramnagar, Gundaram Mandal, Nizamabad.

¶71

lshaq Ahmed, S/o. M.A. Hameed, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No. 16-2-835|D|1, Flat No. 109, Sankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Banglaguda, Hyderabad.

¶72

(The respondents 2 and 3 are the L.Rs of the respondent No. 1)

¶73

RESPONDENTS

¶74

lA NO:2 OF 2025

¶75

P6tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in O.S.No. 13 of 2020 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Nizamabad, pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶76

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. K PALLAVI

¶77

Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED.

¶78

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶79

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD

¶80

THEHON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR	R.EDDY
CIVILREVISION PETITIONNos.415O 4154and	4L56 of2025
DATE:06.O1.2026
CTVILREVISION PETITIONNo.4150of2025
Between:
H.M.lsmail(diedperLRs)andfour others. AND	.Petitioners
Smt. Ahmedi Bcgum(diedpcrLRs)andtwoothers.	....Respondents
CIVILREVISION PETITIONNo.4154 of2O25
Between:
H.M.lsmail(diedperLRs)andfour others ANT)	.....Petitioners
Smt. Ahmedi Begum(diedperLRs)andtwoothers.	...Respondents
CMLREVISION PETITIONNo.4156of2o25
Between:
H.M.lsmail(diedperLRs)andfourothers. AND	. ....Petitioners
Smt.Ahmedi Begum(diedperLRs)andtwoothers	. ...Respondents

¶81

¶82

COMMON ORDER:

¶83

It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the main suit itself was disposed of by the trial Court on 31.I2.2025 and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in these Cirnl Revision Petitions and they have become infructuous.

¶84

Recording the above submission, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

¶85

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these revision

¶86

petitrons shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶87

Sd/. A. JAYASREE AS STANT REGIS

¶88

_./--'-'a

¶89

//TRUE COPY// \ CTION OFFICER \

¶90

To, '1 . The Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magist of First Class. Nizambad.

¶91

One CC to SRl.^{K PALLAVI Advocate} [OPUC]

¶92

Two CD Copies

ASR/kam

ti I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:06101i2026

't
r-iE s
(
o
(J r q
0 ? ? 02 E
* t

¶99

ORDER

¶100

CRP.No.4150,4154 & 4156 OF 2025

¶101

DISMISSING'ttIE CRPs AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶102

5..Fd katar {((rl

H.M. Ismail, v. Smt. Ahmedi Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

H.M. Ismail, v. Smt. Ahmedi Begum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jade Manik Rao Vs Suraj Maroti Sakharkar

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Bela Venkatesham

Sri. Mulla Dawood Vs Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS

H.M. Ismail (Died) Vs Smt. Ahmedi Begum (Died)

H.M. Ismail Vs Smt. Ahmedi Begum

Nethi Saidulu Vs N. Sathyanarayana