Disposed

Sri. Mulla Dawood v. Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS

Telangana HC12 Dec 2025CC/3041/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an interim High Court order directing issuance of new pattedar passbooks was closed after respondents contended the petitioner's application had been rejected and a fresh application under the Bhu Bharati Act was required.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; petitioner permitted to file fresh Bhu Bharati Act application, to be disposed by respondents within four weeks.

Sri. Mulla Dawood Vs Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3041 OF 2025

¶7

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court dated 24.03.2025 passed in l.A.No. l of 2025 in W.P.No.8875 of 2025.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri. lt/ulla Dawood, S/o. Late lt/ulla Azgar Sab, Aged 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H.No.^'19-1 15, Santa Bazar Area, leela Village and A/andal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana.

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Mr. B.M. Santhosh lAS, The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal District

¶13

2 Mr. B. Narsing Rao, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal Division, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

¶14

Smt. Jyothi, The Tahsildar, leeja lVlandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District.

¶15

...Respondents/Respondents

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MD ARSHAD AHMED

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDDRABAD

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

¶21

CONTE IPT CASE No.3O41 ot 2025

DAlE: 12.12 2025

Between

Sri Mulla Dawood

AND

Petitioner

Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS. lud i\vr) (]Lh(,r s

¶28

Re spondents / Responden ts

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This Contemltl (,ti, sir rs lllcil to summon and punish the respondents undcr Scctions I 0 tc I 2 ril lhe Contempt of Courts Act for willfulll, and riclib.r,rr,l-1. vi.l,tin11 1.he orclers d,ated 24.O3.2025 passed b], rhis Court in L;.No. I of .20,25 in Writ petition No.g875 of 2025.

¶31

2 on 24'o3 2o2s, trris Cour r gra.te cr i.terim order in l.A.No. 1 or 2025 n Wrir Petirion No.,Bg /ri ol- 2O25 The operative portion of the ordcr reads as lollo,urrs.

¶32

"Follo , htg t..t. ,,.,t ., .ott.(,. . i).: :t, ) t ^nc-^) w.p Na 2iB::i "i ,,,, i"','.i,.,"l,::l'ir:";i::,:,":i;"::,::^r; Gozette Notqicutto,i .r,o.lg 4 .latt\t t.t i;r;u;;;;:;;;;Z;rrg, respondent Nas .7 b () nte Io Issue new pattedar passbooks ct/tll Lill(' .leed:; k)tltttLtcd subTecr land-s. Lf otrtt:rtr.,ist, r,.r" l.')L..!'n'i't?"or^{in respect ol the} ,7',1i;r"'i,"i,.',i,"',,ii,,il:::i-:;',:::,::""":i'i:1,':"#:::fiii partA .tnleres! n resl)ect of the sublect t""dr. H;;";;;: ,;:;;; sltall br vtbJ..t /o rlr, r.esLll oI t]t,: u.,it petition

¶33

The Learned^{Assistant(loverlllll(lrltPleaderforRevenue'} appearing^{for the Respondents sullmttLed ttLal since the application} submitted^{by the petitioner has bcenrtjecrerl'he is requiredto hle a} fresh application^{as per Lhe provisionsol thc Bhu RharatiAct' It is} contend.ed^{that there was no rvillluldisobcclienceon the partof the} Respondents'^{The karned Assistaut Government Pleader further} submitted^{that for the Petilionc:: to pros(rcutehis case'he must} make a^{fre sh applicatronstrictliiri ;rt L oi-ctltrtccwith the provisions of} the Bhu^{Bharati Act and the [llLl<:s rnadc Lltt:rcunder'}

¶34

4- ln view^{of the aforesaidsubrnissions'LhisContemptCase is} lil)l.t lv^{tomake afresh} closed.^{I{owever,the Petitionct'isitt} application^{underthe provisions ol thcRhu BharaLi Act' duly} cnclosing^{all the requisrtc documents'1or the purpose of effecting} entries^{in the revenuerecords' Upon litir-rg of such applicatron'the} Respondents^{shali dispose o[ ttrc samcitraccordancewith iaw'} within^{a period of fourweeksth('rc:Iflcr'}

¶35

Miscellaneous^{petitions' il anr'' stralls(andclosed-}

¶36

sD/- N cHANH+i.#Hsr[iR

¶37

//TRUE COPY//

¶38

ECTION OFFICER

¶39

To, 1, One CC to Sri^{MD Arshad Ahmed, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶40

Two CD CoPies

¶41

ABK/PSL w

HIGH COURT

DATED: 12112t2025

ORDER

CC.No.3041 of 2025

Ihi Ia
ll,h
6
c,z
I

or^
P,TC

¶47

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

¶48

Jrr9 'rIr\re

Sri. Mulla Dawood v. Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Mulla Dawood v. Mr. B.M. Santhosh IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thodengala Ramnarsaiah Vs Godugu Narender

The Manager, Vs Smt. M. Hamsamma

D Bheeramma Vs T Ravi

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Bela Venkatesham

Mohd.Mujafar, Vs a.Ramesh

Chepuri Sudershan Vs C.Narayana Reddy