M. Ashok Vs M/s. Telangana Rajaka Abhivruddi… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

M. Ashok Vs M/s. Telangana Rajaka Abhivruddi… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the reported disposal of the underlying suit O.S. No. 1128 of 2019 (judgment and decree dated 23.04.2021), any cause remained in Civil Revision Petition No. 1049 of 2023 — which challenges the order dated 20.02.2023 in I.A. No. 437 of 2022 — warranting further adjudication.

Court's answer

The suit in O.S. No. 1128 of 2019 on the file of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad has already been disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 23.04.2021.

Ratio / Principle

In view of the disposal of the underlying suit, the cause in the present civil revision petition no longer survives for further adjudication.

Key takeaways

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶41-43

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India dismissed as infructuous — underlying suit already disposed of. M. Ashok (Petitioner/Defendant No. 1) challenged, by C.R.P. No. 1049 of 2023 before the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, the order dated 20.02.2023 passed in I.A. No. 437 of 2022 in O.S. No. 1128 of 2019 on the file of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; the plaintiff was M/s. Telangana Rajaka Abhivruddi Samstha (Rep. by President V. Nageswara Rao), and Defendants Nos. 2 and 3 were M. Shankar and Smt. Pasham Anasuyamma. A companion application (I.A. No. 1 of 2023, under Section 151 CPC) had sought stay of all further proceedings in the suit pending disposal of the CRP. On taking up the matter, the Court was informed that the suit had already been disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 23.04.2021. Holding that, in view of this development, the cause in the revision petition no longer survived for further adjudication, Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy dismissed the CRP as infructuous (order dated 06.02.2026), with no order as to costs, and directed that pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. The merits of the impugned interlocutory order were not examined and no precedent was cited.

[³⁴⁸⁶ ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1049 OF 2023

Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the^Order dated 2OlO2l2O23 passed in 1.A.No.437 of 2022 in OS No.1128 of 2019 on the^{fib of} the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

M. Ashok, S/o Late Narsimha, Aged about 57^years, Occ: Painting Labour, R/o. H.No. 9-1-232, Harrdaspura, Langer House, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant No.¹

AND

M/s. Telangana Rajaka Abhivruddi Samstha, Rep. by the^President V. Nageswara Rao, S/o. V. Ramulu, aged 54^years, Occ: Pvt.^Employee,lts Registered Office at Near HUDA Park, Langer House, Hyderabad - 500008,

...RespondenURespondenUPlaintiff

M. Shankar, S/o l\4. Narasimha, Aged about 45^{years,Occ: Business} R/o H.No. 9-1 23212 Haridaspura, Langer House, Hyderabad.

Smt. Pasham Anasuyamma, Wo. Late P. Yadaiah, Aged^{about73 years,} Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No 9-2-136, Gollabasthi, Near Hanuman^Temple, Langer House. Hyderabad

.,.Respondents /Respondents/Defendant No.2 &³

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

Petition under Sectron 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^petitron, the^High Court^{may be pleasedto stayof all} further proceedings in O.S No^.l 128 of 2019 on the file of the^{lV Senior Civil Judge,} City Civil Court, Hyderabad,^pending disposal of the^CRP.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BVSS BALAKRISHNA^{RAN.J T} Counsel for the Respondents: - - - -

The Court made the following: ORDER

//

IN THE IIIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAI)

THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{VAKTTIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY}

C.R.P.No.1049 of 2023

Date:06.02.2026

Between:

M.Ashok.

.. . Petitioner

AND

M./s. Telangana Rajaka^{Abhivruddi Samstha andOthers.}

...Respondents

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is^{fited aggrievedby the order} dated 20.02.2023^passed in^{t.A.No.437 ol' 2022 in O.S.No.1128of} 2019 on the file of learned IV^{SeniorCivit Judge, City Civil Court'} Hyderabad

Heard Sri B.V.S.S.B.K.Raniit,^{leamed counselfor the} petitioner. There is no representation^{on behalfoftherespondents.}

When the matter is^{taken up tbr hcaring'it is broughtto the} notice of the Court that^{the suit in O.S'No. I128of 2019 on the frle of}

2

leamed IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courr, yderabad has

already been disposed of vide judgment and decree date < 23 .04.2021

In view of the above development, cause in tlt present civil

revision petition no longer survives for further adjudicai tn

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disurissed as

infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shatt sran I closed.

SD/- A.I; IEENIVASA^REDDY ASS,I ;TANT REGISTRAR

/ffRUE COPY//

__-e-"-

S CTION OFFICER

To, 1 The lV Senior Civil Judge, City^{CivilCou(,Hyderaba} 2 One CC to Sri BVSS Balakrishna^{Raniit, Advocate} [OPt]^)l 3 Two CD Copies

r\llK,'l'SL&-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0O10212026

ORDER

CRP.No.1049 of2023

..-- l . Ti-l A!
o
.J
i! rt,fl 202h z
.9
': .'2r
I
....
'Jl
:,

DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS

WITHOUT COSTS

a) ;[-rs
1-l-n