Asad Ali Vs State of Telangana

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C. prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe} pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No-^{1305/2017 am die file of Special} Judicial Magistrate of First class^{(Excise) Ranga Reddy cumV Addl. Junior civil} Judge-V Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Ranga Reddy correspondingto Crime No.} 1 65 of 2014 registered by Saroornagar^{Police Station, Rachakonda} commissionerate, against the^{petitioners / A-1 andA-2in the interestof justice.}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2!23

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of^{CI-P.Cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be} pleased to stay of all further proceedings^{includrng the appearance of the} petitroners / A-1 and A-2 in c.c. No.¹ 305/2017^{on the file of specialJudicial} i\Iagistrale of First Class (Excise) Ranga Reddy^{cum V Addl Junior Civil Judge-V} Addl. Metropolitan Magisttrate, Ranga Reddy corresponding^{to Crime No. 165 of} 2014 registered by Saroornagar Police Station,^{Rachakonda Commissionerate,} pending d isposal of main Criminal Petitbn, in the interest of iustice.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^Nilemorandum of _ Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri^MOHD ANWAR ALl, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared^for the Respondent No.2.

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶22

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶23

CRII'IINAL PETITIOI{ No.6693 of 2023

¶24

Date:12.02.2026

¶25

Between: Asad Ali and another

¶26

A*D

¶27

'.'Petitioners

¶28

The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana, Hyderabad through Saroornagar Police Station, Rachakonda and another

¶29

...Respondents

¶30

ORDER

¶31

When the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed Additional Public Prosecutor submitted a copy of Case Details information pertaining to C.C No l305 ot 2917 whictt discloses that during the pendency of this criminal petition, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat. Hence, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive and has become infructuous.

¶32

ln view of the above submission, this Criminal Petition is

¶33

dismissed as infructuous.

¶34

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall^stand

¶35

closed.

¶36

SD'- K.BHAVANI^SWAMY ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR (7

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

1 The Soecral "c,vrr Judge_"V^{Judrcral lvlagistrate} nio'i^{of First} tvtetropotitan^c-lass Magistrate, Ranga^{(Excise).RangaReddy.} Reddy^{cum V} njir"5r","i

¶41

t 1,aan 1

¶42

I

¶43