In a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court dismissed the application as infructuous because the police had filed the charge sheet and the case was pending trial in the lower court, making the cause for quashing the FIR nonexistent.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty to avail appropriate remedies as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
:PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11050 OF 2023
Between:
Jeevan Prasad, s/o _Nagaiah, Aged 50 yrs, occu. Business, Rio Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District.
Petitioner/Accused No. 1
AND
Respondents/Complai na nt
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceeding in Cr.NO. 477 of 2023 on the file of Jagadgirigutta Police Station, Cyberabad, as not maintainable by allowing this Criminal Petition.
IAN 1 0F 2023
Petition under Section 482 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Cr.NO. 477 of 2023 on the file of Jagadigirigutta Police, Station, Cyberabad including calling the petitioner to Police station, pending disposal of main petition on the file of the High Court
The pettion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the fVemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Raj Kumar Rudra, Advoc;rte for the Petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for Respondent No.2.
The Court macle the following : ORDER
\
\ 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMIN PETITION No.1 10 O ot 2O23
DATE OF ORDER:1 1.02.2026
Between
Jeevan Prasad
Petitioner/Accused No. 1
AND
The State of Telangana rep. by Public Prosecutor & another
...Respondents
ORDER
discloses that the Policeconcerned,after conductingthorough investigation, laid charge sheetin the said crime and the same was nurnbered as C.C.No.1O21 of2025,which is pending on the file of the learned lll Additional JuniorCivil Judge-cum-XlV Additiorral Judicial Magistrate ofFirst Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpaly. Thus, the cause inthe Criminal Petition seekingi quash of FIR does not survive andhas become infructuous.
closed
Sd/- P.C. SULEKHA DEV! ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
a :. J
cfts"rabad
j I tIt
HIGH COIJRT
DATED:1'1 10212026
ORDER
CRLP.No.1 1050 of 2023
lHE S
()
()
z
1 J 11 r':1 '?q
t t
TC}
Dismissinrg the Criminal Petition as infructuous
yb
b
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition seeking quashing of FIR is maintainable in view of the charge sheet being filed and trial pending.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jeevan Prasad
The State of Telangana
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
