Dismissed¶36

Kolluri Ganesh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Feb 2026CRLP/10681/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, CRLP No. 10681 of 2023 (S.482 Cr.P.C. quash petition), decided 12.02.2026 by Justice Tirumala Devi Eada: petition by accused Kolluri Ganesh to quash CC No. 15 of 2018 (JFCM Bellampally) dismissed as infructuous because the trial court had already disposed of that case on 03.02.2025; petitioner left with liberty to pursue available remedies; no merits argued, no precedent cited; Respondent No. 2 absent.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies as available under law; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed. ¶36

Kolluri Ganesh Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

jr::l.. ; ---, 'ri. ':rlr j-.-.

¶3

[^344.4 ]

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶5

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10681 OF 2023

¶9

Between:

¶10

Kolluri Ganesh, S/o Ankulu, Aged about 52^years, Occ- Business, R/o^{H. No} 5-86, SMG-1 lncline Road, Dubbagudem, Kasipet^{Mandal, Mancherial District}

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor,^{High Court of} TS, Hyderabad

¶14

Narishetti Venkaiah, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 50^{years, R/o} Q.^{No T-17,} Bharath Colony, Somagudem, Bellampally Mandal,^{Mancherial District}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the High Court may} be pleased to quash the CC No 15 of 2018 on the^{file of Hon'ble JudicialFirst} Class Magislrate, at Bellampally against to^{petitioner/accused herein.}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2023

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,^praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal^{Petition,the High Courtmay} be pleased to stay all further^{proceedings includingappearanceofthe} petitroner/accused in the CC No 15 of 2O18 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial^First Class Magistrate, at Bellampally, until^{pending disposalof the crrminal petition.}

¶19

Thrs Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{l/emorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri K lvlallikarjun,} Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor^{for the State of Telangana} on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared^{for Respondentno.2.}

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHES TATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶22

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TI RUMALA DEV!EADA

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITIOI{ tto.lo681 ot m23

Date:12.02.2026

Between:

Kolluri Ganesh

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS, Hyderabad and another

¶30

...Respondents

¶31

ORDER

¶32

When the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed Additional

¶33

Public Prosecutor submitted a copy of Case Details which discloses that C C.No.15 of 2018 was disposed of before the trial Cou( on 03.02.2025 Hence, the cause in the Criminal petition

¶34

does not survive and has become infructuous.

¶35

ln view of the above submission, this Criminal petition is

¶36

dismissed as infructuous, with a liberty to the petitioner to avail

¶37

the remedies as available under law.

¶38