Writ petition challenging the APPSC selection process for Child Development Project Officer posts, alleging non-compliance with reservation and multi-zone vacancy distribution. Dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of petitioners' counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION(TR) NO: 2011 OF 2017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue to declare the selection process undertaken by the 2nd respondent in pursuance of the notification dt.29.12.20'12 bearing No.2512012,fot the posts of Child Development Project officer in WomenDevelopment and Child Welfare Service in the State of Andhra Pradesh, is wholly andillegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to undertake theselection processby
following the rule of reservation and distribution of vacancies between Multi Zone I and ll as per ther declaration in the notification itself and pass such other order.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. S SHARAT KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents No 1 : GP FOR SERVICES- lll
counsel for the Respondent No 2: sRl P. s RAJASEKHAR (sc FoR Tcpsc)
The Court madr: the following: ORDER
tt t
IIY THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK
MIT PETITION {Tr.l No.2O11 OF 2Ol7
tttp FouRTH DAy oF DEcEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
Between:
G'. Bhuvaneshwari and two others
...Petitioners
AND
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Women & Child Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and another.
...Respondents
ORDER:
On 13.11 .2025, 18. i 1 .2025 and 26.1L.2O25, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. As such, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Today, in spite of the matter being listed under the said caption, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either in the forenoon or afternoon sessions. It can, thus, be inferred that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case any further.
2
n I1
Mi:;cellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ
SD/-M. JAWAHAR REDDY
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI S SHARAT KUIUAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRl. P. S RAJASEKHAR (SC FOR TGPSC) [OPUC]
? I J
4 Two CD Copies DANBS bu
BS
\ \
HIGH COIURT
DATED:0,111212025
I
ORDER
WP(TR).N,o.201 1 ot 2017
'ftr.. S
t
o
()a t 3 l.|Afi 7t?fr
DISMISSINIIG THE WRIT PETITION (TR) FOR NON.PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
15 ab
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the selection process for Child Development Project Officer posts followed the rule of reservation and Multi Zone vacancy distribution as notified.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Bhuvaneshwari
Md. Raziya
Ch. Radhika
Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Women & Child Welfare Department
Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, rep. by its Secretary
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
