P.V.K. Upender Rao v. The District Educational Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court, Justice Pulla Karthik, 04-12-2025: WP(TR).No.1814 of 2017 dismissed for non-prosecution without costs after petitioner's repeated absence (11.11.2025, 18.11.2025, 26.11.2025 and on the hearing date). Underlying challenge (not decided on merits) was to proceedings dated 2.10.2013 in Rc No. 151218.218,312010 of the District Educational Officer, Khammam, seeking DSC 1986 manual merit list, notional SGT-cadre benefits from initial appointment, monetary benefits and notional promotion as H.M.Gr.II (Gazetted); petition filed under Article 226; counsel: K.V. Sudhakar Reddy for petitioner, GP for School Education for respondents.
What did the court decide?
From the absence of any representation for the petitioner on 11.11.2025, 18.11.2025 and 26.11.2025, and again on the hearing date in both the forenoon and afternoon sessions despite listing under the caption 'for dismissal', it can be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case further.