A transferred writ petition concerning an employee allotted to Andhra Pradesh despite objections, with a claim to continue in Telangana where her husband works. Counsel submitted no further orders were needed; the court closed the transferred writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATF NC ,-Fr . .. [3301 ] . OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, ,,,O E R Two;ij o u3i JS, ff,J# Eo;??cEMB
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Between:
wRIT PETtTtON TR NO: 20 F2017
I#',.:itl,fl:::?$H:xi::[#n",.s:**ph#:i.,.,,x""yi*1:/.: a rs, mal
AND
...PETITIONER
2 3:x's,""J,J""1?:g?Td:?tTilf :#"lliSs"iE?';,t*flf, ln!ffi g'yng,,, 3 Director of Animal Husbandry, State of Telangana, Santhinagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to decrare the action of the Respondents in arotting the appricant to State of Andhra pradesh vide order No.s (2)/2016, dated 14.1 .2016 without considering her option and objections and the consequentiar orders in Roc No 300/8/2014, dated 20-1 .2016 issued by the 3rd Respondent rerieving the applicant as whoily iilegar, arbitrary and viorative of Articres 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly decrare that the appricant is entifled to continue in state of rerangana as her husband is working in State of rerangana.
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRIAJAY BABU' REP' SRIRAVI KONDAVEETI
Counselfor the Respondents:GPFOR SERVICES
TheCourt made the following:ORDER
E.
! ,
i
Be
IIV ?IIE HIGH COURT FOR TH E STA?E 4T I{YDERABAD OF. TELAIYGANA THE HON,BLE
SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
T oN TR No .5 442 of 2o17 Dated 3.a 5u"u rnber, 2O2S.
ea:
Y. Krishna Jyorhi
AND
AND il}i#,T:gq** Dai.,, i^..],"cretarY, Anir 5#X i;::,:rT:{i,: ;;i'J:tHY.bu.,d., - - -'- r a,a r B u i rd i n gs. r;J:.;H ?:[,iorji.Jj
; n ",...
ORDER:
... Petitioner
Respondents
When the rnatte. counsei, representing a. '" 'uutn 'o,ot hearing, Sri Ajay Babu, learned LRavi Kondaveeti, submits that no further learned counsel for the petitioner, rrders are require petifion. d to be passed in the present writ
2 In view of the above, the Writ petition (TR) is ciosed
Miscellarteou s application5, iI ury, p"rld shall stand closed. No costs. ing in this writ petition (TR),
SD/- T. Sriniva saR //TRUE coPY// AS STANT RE RAR CTION OFFICER l,:: the State of Telangana at
To,
, ryf"s3:Jh"#ill:J:;::::ffi,:ff,::
BSR \t $\
&
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0311212025
ORDER
WP(TR).No.5442 of 2017
g,';
o r1 sl4
( o
li ,.t
i:..)
2 4 l'rAR 2l]2 n z
., *
r) PATC
cLoslNGTHE WRlr PETlrloN (TR),
WITHOUTCOSTS
,+,'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Y. Krishna Jyothi
Director of Animal Husbandry, State of Telangana
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
