Writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against proposed acquisition of the petitioner's land without compensation under G.O.Ms.No.123 was closed after counsel submitted the prayer no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRSTDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNO: 829 OF 2016
Between:
Kunduri RavinderReddy,S/o Sathya Narayana Reddy,-agedqbol} 97.years,occ Agriculture r/o Nadugulapallyvillage.ThiprarthiMandal .Nalgond'-Dglgt'31,"-"9IJI reliaing At H.No.6-0-19/1 ,Yata Kanna Reddy Colony Hyderabad Road,Nalgonqa Town and District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 oI lhe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfrled therewith, the High court may be pleased to lssue an appropriatewrit,order or Direction, more particularly onein the nature of writ ofMandamus, to declare the actionof the respondent authorities inproposingto acquire petitionerland in sy.No.361 , 370, 371 admeasuring Ac.0.23 Gts., Ac. 0.37 Gts, and Ac. 0.06 gts, totallyadmeasuring Ac.l.26gts.,situatedatMadugulapallivillage,ThipparthyMandal,Nalgonda District, withoutpayingthe compensation in termsof G.o.Ms.No. 123 dl.3O-7' 2015 as being illegal,arbitrary,u nconstitutionaI and violativeof Article 21 and 300-A of the constitutionof lndia and consequently direct the respondent authorities to follow theprocedure contemplated under the Land AcquisitionAct and the guidelines specifiedin G.O.trilsNo.123 cit. 3o-7-2015, and to grant such
,,/'/// ili
other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: 10F2016 PMP. NO: 1 009 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 1s'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner Interfere with the peacefur possession and enjoyment of the petitioner rn respect of the rands in Sy.No.361, 370,371 admeasuring Ac.O.23 gts., Ac.0.3Z gts., and Ac.0.06 gts., totally admeasuring Ac.1.26 gts., situated at Madugulapalli Village, Thipparthy Mandal, Nalgonda District, without paying the compensation, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition
Counsel for the petitioner : SRI A.VISHNU VARDHAN REDDy
Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2:Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent 3: Gp FOR LAND ACQU|SIT|ON
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETTTTON No. a29 oF 2016
OR"DER!
When tJlematter is taken up for hearing' learned counsel instructions,submitsthat the prayer for the; petitioner,on writ petition noIonger survivesfor sought, forinthis furtherorders are required in the adjudicationas such no present writ Petition'
Miscellaneous Petitions,ifany, pendingin this writ
petition shallstand closed'No costs
SDIB.G.VYJAYANTHI AS S NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTIONOFFICER
To,
€BSK GJP
I1 i i
I Ii I ! ,l i I l
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10412025
ORDER
WP.No.829 of 2016
1HL
./(ca
,',':).
io
1) 2 5 AU6 205 f'l- ,)
i')
+
+
)l
-^, L i'i)
-.\ . ':.i' ;i-
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kunduri Ravinder Reddy
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
The District Collector, Nalgonda District
The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer (R D O) A M R Project Unit-II, Nalgonda
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
