Disposed¶21

Smt. Hina Begum v. M/s Teena Enterprises

Telangana HC21 Apr 2025ARBAPPL/90/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC, Arbitration Application No. 90 of 2024, disposed/closed 21-Apr-2025 by Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar. Applicant: Smt. Hina Begum (counsel: Syed Ashfaq Ahmed); Respondents: M/s Teena Enterprises and Smt. Teena Satia (counsel: Sujith Jaiswal). Filed for appointment of a presiding arbitrator under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (sub-sections 5 & 6) with Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 2006 para (3)(i)(c); closed after counsel reported the parties' dispute was settled out of court; no order as to costs. No cases cited; no monetary amounts involved.

What did the court decide?

None; the Arbitration Application was closed following the reported out-of-court settlement, without appointing a presiding arbitrator and with no order as to costs. ¶21

Smt. Hina Begum Vs M/s Teena Enterprises — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶5

ARBITRATION APPLICATION N Oi 90 OF 2024

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt. Hin-a _Begum, Wo Mohammed Abdul Nayeem Aged About.40 yrs, Occ. Housewife/Business Rl/o H. No. 22-6-1 0 1 0, lrani'Gali, Hy:OeraOaO.'

¶8

AND

¶9

...Applicant

¶10

1 M/s Teena Enterpris-es, Represented by its proprietor Smt. Teena Satia W/o :l:1:"^1,s,,19h,rya,40.yrs,^{Rl/o H. No. 5_8_.105/4,/1, NampailyStation Road,} t\ampa y, Hyderabad _ 50000.1.

¶11

Smt. Teena Satia, Wo gr.,111ggt_gllSh A/a 40 yrs, Occ. proprietor lvl/s Teena Enterprises,^{R/o H No.s-B'-1ostNi, Nampaily} Siaiion Ro;!, tiil;;ili,""^'- Hyderabad - 500001.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

Arbitration Apprication fired under sub-section (5 & 6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 read with para (3) (i)(c) of Siheme tor nppointmeni ot Arbitrators, 2006 praying that this Hon'bre couri may be preased io appoint a presiding Arbitrator to adjudicate the claims and disputes between the applicani and Respondents.

¶14

Counsel for the Applicant : Sri. Syed Ashfaq Ahmed

¶15

Gounsel for the Respondents :Sri Sujith Jaiswal

¶16

The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

¶17

THE HONOIIRABLE^{SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KIJMAR}

¶18

A^'bitration ADPlication^{No.9Oof 2o24}

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The lcirt :: ,,-1 counsel^{for the Applicant sub:nits thatthe} lis betu,eet'i Lhc' lartles^{has been settled out of the (lor rrt zLnd no} further orcltr;^{:, 1,.: requirecl to be passed in the rresclltArbilration} Application

¶21

Accolc ns1l ' , recording^{the saidsubmissionnrade lry lhe learned} counscl for- |^'r Applicant this^{ArbitrationApplictrrionrs closed'} Thcrc shall br: rt^r order^{as Lo costs}

¶22

As :. ,. t'r rel, miscellaneous applications,^{il ln,rpending,}

¶23

shall stand clos,^,l

¶24

Sd/. K. SFIINIVASA RAO .^{JCIINT REGISTRAR} //TRUE COPY// To, '^{sEct'toN oFF|CER} '1 One CC ro S "i Syed Ashfaq Ahmed, Advocate,[ PUC] ? 9n" 9?^{tc S-, SujirhJaiswat, Advocaie} topucl 3. Two CD ()oo tts DUkam

HIGH COURT

DATED:Z11041202!

ORDER

ARBAPPL.No.9) 'rt²⁰²⁴

¶29

Be. it4/ :.c\
F
/, .* 1ar
i ,.)
,\l ) 2i IilI Y 2 125
c2
o
t t
.Oe ,-1,A1 :
"f.'
-r=

¶30

5
(,4
5
,d