Petitioner sought ex-gratia for land resumed for APIIC Ltd. acquisition in Maheshwaram. On hearing no one appeared for the petitioner on two consecutive listings, and the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ss ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Origina Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVEN EENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND A D TWENTY FIVE
PRES NT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST CEN.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO 321800F20'13
Between:
S m B m bad J a nsam ma o Late B m di Agaiah, aged about 65 YearsOcc. As f c U u RYo Mah S a ta m as Ra n( anagiar Mandal, RangaReddy District. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the nstitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit file therewith, the High CourtmaYbe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaringthe acti n of the respondents 2and 3 in not considering the representationsdated 01.2010 and 11.0120'10 and not paying the ex-gratia to thepetitioner theI nds resumed for acquisitionof APIIC Ltd., to an extent of Ac.01.20gts in Sy No. 306 situated at Maheshwaram Village and IVlandal, RangaReddyDistric is illegal, arbitrary, highhandedand violative ofprinciples of naturaljustice an consequently direct the respondents to pay the ex-gratia tothe petitioner for the lands resumed to anextent of Ac.1 .2O gts in Sy No. 306 situatedat Mah shwaram Village and Mandal,Ranga Reddy District.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 WPMP.NO: 40019 OF 13
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC Pr ing that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petitin, the High CourtmaY be Pleased to direct the respondents topay the ex-gratia o the petitioner for thelands resumed to Ac.1 .20gts in Sy No.306 situateda l,4aheshwaram Village andMandal, Ranga Reddy Districtpending disposal of t e main writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. E VENKA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR LA D ACQUISITION The Court made the following:ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.32180 of 2013
ORDER
On 76.04.2025, r.r,hen the matter was takell up for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal,. In spite of thc rnatter being posted under the caption'for dismissal,, there is no representation on behatf of the petitioner either ir-r physical mode or in ',,irtual rnode. Hence, there is r-ro other option to this Coult erce;-rt to disrniss the Writ Petition for nonprosecution.
non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs
3 As secluel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pcnding,
shall stand tl ismissed
To,
SD/ SWAMY //TRUE COPY// ASSI'i, ISTRAR 'SECTION oFFIcER
'1 . One CC to SRt. E VENKATA REDDY, Advocate. 1OeUC1 2. Iryo CCs to Gp FOR LANqAqOUtStTtON, vrr! High 'l rrvrr Court vr for rhe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. tOUn
o CYS GJP
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1710412025
ORDER
WP.No.32180 of 2013
t- s S t
b{i I€
o
c) .1!
tlJ8 2m
rl .t
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
ol
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents should be directed to pay ex-gratia for land resumed for APIIC acquisition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sim Bibi bad Jansamma (W/o Late Bimdi Agaiah)
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
Special Grade Deputy Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division
The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
N.V.Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
