Writ petition challenging a Tribunal order relating to appointment as Assistant Public Prosecutor was dismissed for default and non-prosecution when the petitioner's counsel did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34451
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE SI TELANGANA AT HYDE#JE DOF (rrpeciat Original Jurisdiction)
MO,|IDI! rHE TENIH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWo THoUSAND AND rwerrrrv rii.e,.'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI THE HONOUR^".,,::}[iJI,Hil,TJ ::;;,.'
WRIT PE TITION NO:5453 0 F 2017
Between:
5,r'B["i,[!:;,.,1r'i,..','.% ?l,L[liiii,[S;;f'r?l^:l K:?,;i fli;i#J"l]"_ibt
AND
...PETITIONER
t IB oil?Tfl:;::,,.,",T::i:ffool6o[ijhon,"" or Director Generar or porice or
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the orders passed in o'A' No' 6'r6''l of 2014 dated 28.10.2014 0n the file of A.p. Administrative Tribunar' Hyderabad and set aside the same (ii) and consequenry direct the
Respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of Assistant public prosecutor ( iii) pass
l.A. NO: 2OF 2017(WP MP. NO: 6652 oF 20171
Petition under section r s'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the G.o.t\4s.No.116, Home (court-A) Department dated 25.07.2015 and the consequentiar proceedings in proc.No.'r 4 sg rB1 r2o1 2da1ed 1 8.08.20.r 5
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt B SESTBUSHAN RAO(NOT pRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR GAD
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 and 3: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: Gp FOR SERVICES I
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI p. V. RAMANA
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
WRIT PETITIONN0.5453 0F 2()17
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Si Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauiti)
None appeared for the petitioner, though the Writ Petition is listed today under the caption .for dismissal'. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ petition for default and also for non-prosecution.
default as well as for non-prosecution. No costs
if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. L. VIJAYALAXMI ASSI TANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1
TJ GJP UIQ
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010212025
ORDER
WP.No.5453 of 2017
t HE Sr4
(c
) (
o
3 rl I'IAY 2025
?('
a
t o on1.-1^9iO-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT AS WELL AS NON-PROSECUTTON WITHOUT COSTS
UP
$
v do<
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Bala Brahmaiah (name unclear in OCR)
The State of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration Department
State Level Police Recruitment Board, represented by Director General of Police
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department
A.P. Administrative Tribunal, represented by its Registrar
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
