Dismissed¶46

D.Anuradha v. D.Sarojini

Telangana HC10 Feb 2025AS/396/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, 10-02-2025, AS.No.396 of 2004: appeal under Section 19 Family Courts Act against Family Court, Hyderabad judgment/decree dated 18/08/2003 (OP.No.5'1 of 2000); D.Anuradha v. D.Sarojini and Director, A.P.Govt.Text Book Press; appeal dismissed for default and non-prosecution, no costs, appellant and counsel (M Basith Ali Yavar) absent, listed under caption 'for dismissal'; related Section 151 CPC interim injunction sought to restrain payment of death benefits and pensionary benefits to Respondent No.1; no merits adjudicated; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None; the Appeal was dismissed for default and for non-prosecution with no costs, and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were directed to stand closed. ¶46

D.Anuradha Vs D.Sarojini — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

[³⁴⁴⁵ ]

I l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶5

MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶9

APPEAL SUIT NO: 396 OF 2004

¶10

Appeal Under section^'19 of Family Courts Act, against the Judgment and Decree Dated 18/08/2003 made in OP.No.5'1 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Judge Family Court, Hyderabad.

¶11

¶12

Between:

¶13

D.Anuradha, Wo.late D.Rajeshwar, Rlo 12-11-1207, Boudha Nagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad-

¶14

...AppellanUPlai ntiff

¶15

AND

¶16

1 D,Sarojini, D/o not known, aged about 50 yrs, Occ: House wife, R/o. 1 -1 -3OOl43l 1, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad. 2 The Director, A.P.Govt.Text Book Press, Mint compound, Hyderabad.

¶17

...Respondents/Defendants

¶18

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2004(CMP. NO: 1341 OF 2004)

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction restraining the respondent No.2 him from paying the death benefits and pensionary benefits to the Respondent No.1 or any other person pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice.

¶20

Counsel for the Appellant :Sri M Basith Ali Yavar [Not Present]

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Kowturu Pavan Kumar

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : ___

¶23

The Court delivered the following: Judgment

¶24

a*rln -7
-/
/

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI} AND

¶26

THE HON'BLE SMT.^{JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA}

¶27

A. S.No.396 OF 2OO4

¶28

JUDGMENT: lPer^{the Hon'bte Si JusticeAbhinand KumarShauili)}

¶29

None appeared for the^{appellant, thoughthe}

¶30

Appeal is listed today^{under the caption 'for dismissal''} Hence, this Court has^{no other option, except to} dismiss the Appeal for^{default and also for non-} prosecution.

¶31