Appeal against enhancement of land acquisition compensation from Rs.15 lakh to Rs.25 lakh per acre for acquired land at Srinagar Village, Maheshwaram. Court upheld enhancement, finding a registered sale deed of the same survey number supported the Reference Court's award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[344s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 80 OF 2020
Appeal Under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 against the Judgment and decree dated 0611112O19 made in L.A.O.P.No.234 of 2011 on the file of the court of the lll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Officer, L.A., Unit - l, Outer Ring Road Project, Hyderabad.
..,APPELLANTiREFERRING OFFICER
AND
Smt.Rajamoni Anjamma, Wo Venkataiah, Aged 60 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Thukkuguda Mllage, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangreddy District
,..RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of thejudgment and decree dated 06/11/2019 in L.A. O.P.234 ot 2011, passed by the lll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the LA Appeal, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Appellant :GP FOR APPEALS
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI V RAGHUNATH
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
L.A.A. S.No.8O of 2O2O
JTIDGMENT: per Hort'bte Justice Abhinand. Kumar Shnuiti)
Heard the learned Government pleader for Appeals, appearing for the appellant and Sri V.Raghunath, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2' This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short, the ActJ is filed aggrieved by the order and decree dated 06.ll.2otg passed in L.A.O.p.No.234 of 2011 on the frle of the III Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as "the Reference CourtJ.
'-l
2
Rs.25,00,0O0 / - per acre vide order dated O6.t l .2}tg , without appreciating any of the contentions raised by the appellant herein. Therefore, appropriate orders be passed in the appeal by setting aside the orders passed by the reference Court in LAOp No.234 of 2011, dated 06. 11.2019 and allow the appeal.
/
J
I
\
is not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the Reference
Court
costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in
this appeal, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOiNT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
ADK/Dt- ry--
HIGH COUR-T
DATED:061A212025
JUDGMENT+DECREE
2 DRAFTS
LAAS.No.80 of 2020
T AT E
s,
o
I j)N ff,
t1 f
,J I
I D E S P A1
DISMISSING THE LAAS
WITHOUT COSTS
.l,1
fv1
0
1t
^
30
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THESIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE
RESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICETIRUMALADEVI EADA
LAND ACQUISITIONAPPEALSUIT NO: 80 OF 2020
Between:
TheSpecialDeputyCollector,LandAcquisitionOfficer,L'A,Unit-l,OuterRing Road Project' Hyderabad
...A''ELLANT/REFERRINGoFFtcER
AND
Smt.RajamoniAnjamma,WoVenkataiah,Aged60Years,OccAgriculture'R:/o Thukkuguda Village,Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangreddy District
...RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS
AppealUnderSection54ofL.A.Actlsg4againsttheJudgmentanddecree dated 06111/2019made in L.A.O.P.No.234ot 2O11on the file of the court of the lll Additional DistrictJudge, Ranga Reddy Districtat L B-Nagar'
This appeal coming onfor hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' theJudgmentandDecreeoftheLowerCourtandthematerialpapersintne!91 and upo"n hearing the argumentsof GPFORAPPEALSfor the Appellant andof sRl V RAGHUNATH, Advocatefor the Respondent.
This Court doth OrderandDecree as follows:
1 . That the LAASbe and hereby is dismissed;
SD/.K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
ADK/DL M.
HIGH COURT DATED:0610212025
DECREE
LAAS.No.80of 2020
DISMISSINGTHE LAAS WITHOUTCOSTS
fn 1
q $
t D
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Reference Court was justified in enhancing compensation from Rs.15,00,000 to Rs.25,00,000 per acre based on sale deeds examined by the Land Acquisition Officer.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Officer, L.A., Unit-1, Outer Ring Road Project, Hyderabad
Smt. Rajamoni Anjamma, Wo Venkataiah
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
