Disposed

Dharavath Chandi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Dec 2025WP/39083/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus directing police to act on her representation for protection of agricultural land pursuant to a civil court order granting police aid in an interim application. The court, without examining merits, directed the authorities to consider the representation and take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Respondent authorities directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2025 and take appropriate action in accordance with law in terms of the civil court order dated 02.09.2024.

Dharavath Chandi Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32s5 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 39083 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Dharavath Chandi, Wo Late Nanda, Aged about 81 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Gaydmvarigudem Village, Chivvemla Mandal Suryapet District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'l . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

Director General of Police, For the State of Telangana.

¶13

Superintendent of Police, Suryapet District.

¶14

Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Suryapet. 5. Suryapet Rural Circle lnspector of Police, Suryapet. 6. The Station House Officer, Chiwemla, Suryapet District 7. Dharavath Nagu, S/o Late Somani. Aged about 44 Years, Occ Agriculture, Rl,/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶15

B. Dharavath Jaye, S/o Late Somani, Aged about 47 yearc, Occ Homeguard, R/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla l/andal, Suryapet District.

¶16

Dharavath Srinivas, S/o Nagu, Aged about 25 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla [t/andal, Suryapet District.

¶17

'10. Dharavath Dhani, W/o Late Somani, Aged about 69 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District

¶18

1 1. Dharavath Vijaya, Wo Nagu, Aged about 40 years, R/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶19

'l2.Dharavath Sujatha, Sio Jaye, Aged about 42 years, Fl,/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chivvemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order's more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent no.6 in not cOnsidering the representation dt.21l1Ol2O25 of the petitioner seeking police protection in view of the order dt.02logl2O24 in 1.A.No.334/2024 in 1.A.No.323/2021 in O.S.No.154/2021 on the file of Principal Civil Judge, Suryapet and consequentially direct the respondent no.6 to consider the representation dt. 2111012025 of the petitioner and grant police protection to the petitioner from unofficial respondents in view of the order dl. 0210912025 in 1.A.No.334/2024 in 1.A.No.323/2021 in O S No.154l2O21 on the file of Principal Civil Judge, Suryapet

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.6 to grant police protection to the petitioner from unofficial respondents in view of the order dt. 0210912024 in 1.A.No.334/2024 in 1.4.No.32312021 in O.S.No.15412021 on the file of Principal Civil Judge, Suryapet pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRl. S. RAM REDDY

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent's No's 1 to 6: GP FOR HOME

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent's No's 7 lo 12:

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

¶29

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^AT

¶30

HYDERABAD

¶31

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.39083 of 2025 DATE OI: ORDER: 19.1,2.2025

¶32

Between:

¶33

Smt. Dharavath Chandi.

¶34

... Petitioner

¶35

AND

¶36

The State of Telangana, Home Department and eleven others.

¶37

...Respondents

¶38

ORDER:

¶39

Heard learned connscl for the pctitioner and learned Assistant

¶40

Govermnent I'leader for Home appcaring for respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶41

This writ petition is f iled seeking following prayer:-

¶42

"to declnre the inaction of the respondent no 6 in consideing the representation clt 21.L0.2025 L)J' the petitioner seeking police protection in aieru of tlu or.ler dt 02.09.2024 in l.A No.334 of 2024 in [.A No.323 of 202'1 in O.S N0.754 of 2021 on tle fle of Principal Ciztil ludge, Suryapet and consequentially direct the respondent no.6 to considtr the representation dt 2-1.70.2025 of tlte petitioner and grant police protection to tle petitioner from unoffcinl respondents in aieu of tlu order dt 02.09.2024 in LA No.334 o.f 2024 in l.A No.323 of 2027 itt O.S No.154 oJ'2021 on llLe file of Principal Cit il ludge,^Suryapet."

¶43

Brief facts statet{ in tl-ris writ pctition are that the petitioner claims to be

¶44

the owncr and possessol of agricultural land admeasuring to an extent of

¶45

*-*--

¶46

¶47

Ac.2-00 guntas, in Sy.No.117/e, situated at Gayamvarigudem Shivar of Chiwemla Village and Mandal, Suryapet District. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent Nos.7 to 12 with an intention to grab the subiect property are interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession over the subject property, hence, petitioner filecl O.S.No.154 of 2021 and the learned Junior Principal Civil .[udge-Cum-]udicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet uide order dated 02.09.2024 in I.A No.334 of 2024 in I.A No.323 of 2021 in O.S No.154 of 2021, directed the respondent No.6 to provicle police aic-l to the petitioncr anr,l the subject property. Inspite of thc order datctl 02.09.2024, responclcnt authorities did not provide police protection, hencc, petitioner on 21,.70.2025 made a representation and requestecl respondent authorities to provide policc protection to the pctitioner and the. subject propcrty. I{owever, the same is pcnding for consideration. Aggrievecl by the same, this writ petition is f iled.

¶48

l,carned Assistant Government Pleadcr for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6 submits that if petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2025 is still pentling for consideration, the respondent authorities woulcl consider that same and take appropriate action in accordance with [aw.

¶49

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2025 and in terms of the order dated 02.09.2024 passed in I.A No.334 of 2024 in t.A No.323 of 2021 in O.S

¶50

No.154 of 2021, the respondent authorities are directed to take appropriate

¶51

action strictly in accordance with law.

¶52

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous

¶53

applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cosLs.

¶54

¶55

SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SECI.ION OFFICER

To,

'1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶60

The Director General of Police, For the State of Telangana.

¶61

The Superintendent of Police, Suryapet District.

¶62

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Suryapet.

¶63

The Suryapet Rural Circle lnspector of Police, Suryapet.

¶64

The Station House Officer, Chivvemla, Suryapet District

¶65

Dharavath Nagu, S/o Late Somani, Aged about 44 Years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chivvemla [Vlandal, Suryapet District.

¶66

B. Dharavath Jaye, S/o Late Somani, Aged about 47 yearc, Occ Homeguard, Fl,/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶67

Dharavath Sdnivas, S/o Nagu, Aged about 25 years, Occ Agriculture, Fl,/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶68

l0.Dharavath Dhani, W/o Late Somani, Aged about 69 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District

¶69

Dharavith Vijaya, Wo Nagu, Aged about 40 years, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chivvemla lrilandal, Suryapet District.

¶70

Dharavath Sujatha, S/o Jaye, Aged about 42 years, Rl/o Teekamnaik Thanda H/o Gayamvarigudem Village, Chiwemla Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶71

One CC to SRl. S. RAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

¶72

14.Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶73

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:1911212025

ORDER

WP.No.39083 of 2025

I
{ rtE SIa
t
( B JAN 202 6
h

¶80

DISPOSSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶81

WITHOUT COSTS

¶82

¶83

Dharavath Chandi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharavath Chandi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balasani Nishanth Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd Rizwan Ilyas Vs The State of Telangana

Dharmarajula Venkateswara Rao, Vs The State of Telangana

Badduri Ram Mohan Vs Aishwarya

Dr. K. Kannaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Mrs. Kanaka Ratnam Vs Shri v.C.Sajjanar