Balasani Nishanth Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Balasani Nishanth Goud, S/o Late Balsani Ganesh Goud, Aged about 30 yeqr9, Occ- Business, Rl/o. Flat No.103, Sarada Apartm-ent Tower-2, 6-3-596177112, Venkatrarnana Colony Road, Naveen Nagar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶13

The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department Government of Telangana Nampally, Hyderabad

¶14

The Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department Khammam Division, Khammam

¶15

The Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Khammam, Khammam District

¶16

The Superintendent of Prohibition And Excise, Kothegudem, Bhadradri Kothegudem District.

¶17

The Station House Officer, Prohibition and Excise Station, Kothegudem, Bhadradri Kothegudem District

¶18

Chava Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkata Subbaiah, Aged about 55 years, OccBusiness, No.20-5-9612, Contractors Colony, Paloncha, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed theiewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents, more particularly Respondent No.5 in considering the Petitioners application dated

¶21

t!4-:'8tf=*.^.:.JF

¶22

22.09.2025 wherein^{the Petitioner soughtfor inclusion of ortrrpartner, namelyMr'} S.SharathbabuS/oSatyanarayana,intheconstitutiono,.,:heForm-2Blicense videID-o4t2006-200Tasillegal,arbitraryandunconstituti,:ralandconsequently direct the^{Respondentsto considerthe applicationd r ed 22 09 '2025 and} forthwith release^{the stocks promptly to the Petitioner licenri te'}

¶23

IA NO: 10F²⁰²⁵

¶24

PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthe;ircumstancesstated in the affidavrt^{filedin support of the petition,the High CcL t maybe pleased.to} directtheRespondents,moreparticularlyRespondentNo'jtoforthwithconsider the Petitioner's^{applicationdaled 22.09.2025whereinther Petitioner soughtfor} inclusionofonepartner,namelyMr.SSharathbabuS/o{iatyanarayana'inthe constitution^{of the Form-28 licensevide lD- 04i2006-2001' and forthwith release} the stocks^{promptlyto the Petitioner licensee'}

¶25

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRIK.RAGHAVA RAMANA}

¶26

Counsel for^{the RespondentNo.1to 6: AGP FOR PROHIE|IflON & EXCISE}

¶27

Counsel for the^{Respondent No.7: SRI C'HARI PREETH}

¶28

WRIT PETITION^{NO : 32199 OF 2025}

¶29

Between:

¶30

Chava Srinivasa^{Rao, S/o.VenkataSubbaiah,} ^Age(i^{about55 years'Occ} Eiilii,""ri,' il"^{-H rlo.zo-s-rid)','-Conliacto|-i'coionv Paloncha''Bhadradri} Kothagudem District

¶31

...PETITIONER

¶32

AND

¶33

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep. by its Principal Sel etary' Prohibitionand} Excise Department^{S-ecretariat,Hyderabad'}

¶34

2 TheCommissioner,ProhibitionandExciseDep:rmentGovernmentof Telangana NamPallY,^Hyderabad-

¶35

3 The Deputy Commissioner,^{Prohibitionand Excise I epartment' Khammam} Division, Khammam.

¶36

4 The Assistant Commissioner^{of Prohibition and Excis': Khammam Khammam} District.

¶37

5.TheSuperintendentofProhibitionandExciselilthagudem,,Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶38

The station^{HouseOfficer Prohibition and Excist:station, Kothagudem,} Bhadradri Kothagudem^District.

¶39

7 Balasani Nishanth Goud, S/o.Late^{B.Ganesh Goud Aged about38 y.ears, Occ} erriness R/oH.iiio.S-s-dO, Coolie^{line, Kothagudem,Bhadradri Kothagudem} District-

¶40

...RESPONDENTS

¶41

Petition under Article 226 of the^{constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed^{therewith, the High court may be} pleased to rssue an appropriate writ, order^{or Direction,more particularly one in} the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring^{the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to} 6 more^particularly 5th Respondent in^{threatening to make changes in the} License granted in favour of the 7th^{respondentat the premisesM/s.Ganesh} Restaurant and Bar, H.No.5-8-45, Coolie^{Line,Kothagudemunder License} No.04/2006-07 , dl.22to7 t2OO6 to induct third^{party nameswithout considering the} objections raised by the petitioner in the^{Representation dt.14.10.2025as illegal,} arbitrary, u nco n stitutiona I and consequently^{direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 not} to entertain any changes including adding^{of third party namesin the businessat} l\rlls.Ganesh Restaurant and Bar, H.No.5-8-45,^{Coolie Line,Kothagudem} pursuant to the license granted in favour^{of the 7th respondent underLicense} No.04/2006-07, dt.22.07.2006 by duly^{consideringthe objections raised by the} petitioner rn the representation dt.'14.'10.2025.

¶42

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶43

Petition under section¹ 51 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto} direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 not^{to entertain any changes including adding} of third party names in the business^{at M/s.Ganesh Restaurant andBar,} H.No.5-8-45, Coolie Line, Kothagudem^{pursuantto the license grantedin favour} of the 7th respondent under License^{No.04/2006-07, dt.22.07.2006by duly} considering the objections raised by^{the petitionerin the representation} dt.14.10.2025,^pending disposal of the^{above writ petition'}

¶44

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.HARI^PREETH

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent No.'t to 6:^{AGPFOR PROHIBITION& EXCISE}

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI^{K.RAGHAVA RAMANA}

¶47

The Court made the foltowing: COMMON^ORDER

¶48

I I I

¶49

5q-.if

¶50

IN THE IIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF T]',ANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶51

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V,SHIT \VAN KUMAR

¶52

WRIT PETITION Nos.3836 2 and,32L99,,f2o25

¶53

DATE OF ORDER: 18. 12. 2o2s

¶54

Between:

¶55

Sri Balasani Nishanth Goud

¶56

...Petitioner

¶57

AND

¶58

The State of Telar-rgar-ra Rep by its Prir-rcipal Secretarv prohibition and Ert ise Department Secretariat H_vderabad and six others.

¶59

. .Respondents

¶60

COMMON ORDER:

¶61

Heard learned counsel for the petition( I s and learned Assistant G,:vernment Pleader for prohib r :n & Excise Department eLppearing for respondent Nos.1 to ( . Since the lis involved in both the matters is common, tir:1, were heard together and are disposed of with their consent I. the admission stage itself.

¶62

Writ Pel,ition No.38362 of 2025 has been I ted seeking the

¶63

following pra)'er: -

¶64

"to issue an appropiate writ, order or d.irt;^.tion, more particularly one in the nature of Wnt of Il randamus, declaing the inqction of the Responrle tts, more particularly f.espondent 1{o.5 in^-consir ering the

¶65

I

¶66

2

¶67

Petittoners application dated 22.09.2025 u-therein the Petitioner sought for inclusion of one partner, namely Mr. S. Sharathbabu, S/o. Satg anaray ana, in the constttution of the Form-29 license uide ID- 04/20062007 as illegal, arbitranl and unconstitutional an consequentlg direct the Re-sponderuts to consider the appltcation dated 22.09.2O25 and forthwith release the stocks promptlg to the Petitioner licensee."

¶68

Writ Petition No.32199 of 2025 has been frled seeking the

¶69

following prayer:-

¶70

"to issue an appropiate Wit, C)rder or Direction, more particularlg one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Responderi Nos.2 to 6 more porticularly Sth Respondent in threatening to make changes in the License granted in fauour of the 7th respondent at the premises M/ s.Ganesh Restaurant and Bar, H.No.S B-45, CooLie Line, Kothagudem under License No.O4/20O6-07, dt.22.07.20O6 to induct third party names uithout considering the objections raised bg the petitioner in th.e Representation dt. 14.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequentlg direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 not to entertain ang changes including adding of third partg names in the buslness at M/ s.Ganesh Restourant and Bar, H.No.5B-45, Coolie Line, Kothagudem pursuant to th.e license granted in fauour of tl.te 7th respondent under License No.O4/20O6-07, dt.22.07.2006 bg dulg considering tLrc objections raised bg the petitioner in the representation dt.14.10.2025."

¶71

Though various grounds are raised in these writ petitions, learned counsel for the petitioners confine their submissions to the extent of directing the respondent No.S to dispose of the petitioners representations dated 22.09.2025, 14.10.2025 and 17.1O.2025, in a time bound period.

¶72

J

¶73

i

¶74

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for ?rohibition and Excise Department appearing for the responder.t s, submits that if the petitioners' representations dated 22.O9.2(25, 14.lO.2O2S and 17 .10.2025 are still per-rding for corr ;ideration, the respondent zruthorities may be directed to 1ri ss appropriate orders

¶75

Recording the submission made by .r arned counsel appearing on either side and without expressin: an1, opinion on the merits of both the cases, W.P.Nos.38362 anc 32199 of 2O2S are disposed of, directing the respondent No..: to consider the petitioners' (in both the above lr,ri t petitionsl representations daled 22.09.'2025, 14.1O.2O25 arrd 17.1O.2O25 rnd after giving a fair opportunity of hearing to the parties shall I ass appropriate orders strictly in accordance rt.ith lau', as r xpeclitiously as possible, prelerably within a period of four (Ozlp rveeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and comm-r ticate the same to the petitioners.

¶76

7 . Accordingly these writ petitions ar 3 disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sl^ I 1l stand closed.

¶77

No order as to costs.

¶78

SD/- I,SRINIVASA REDDY SIi STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶79

SECTION OFFICER

¶80

To,

¶81

1 The Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise De :g artment, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.