Withdrawal order only; no decision on the merits of the challenge to the land acquisition compensation process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 35395 OF 2025
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of hhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
g,sased to issue of Writ rriate Writ or Direction decrarins the action ", ;^""t ffit'l::, H:: :::.. ;t,:' : towards compensation stributing the cheques the land of the Petitione r ; in Survey No.140 admeasuring Acres 4-21of District as iresa r, a rbitraryti:r"ffiil :: :lHJ:lI fl : Warangal Mandal Sc, 2 and 3 to consider the the Respondent Nos. oblections submitted on 0B-'10 l Acquisition of their rand ',. 025 to the proposed Nakka tpa,y, ron *r r" rnu,tffJrYj:lff ::T::: ;: s 4-2 1 gts situated at e of the proceedings No.Rc.B/1 590/2024 dated Under Section uo ",,n" *=1; l^':;H[i:li:;ff"n, lents 2 and 3 to refer this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstar ( rppropriate orders as es of the case.
IANO:1 oF292s
petition under Sec il:"ffi""."'j,::,lifi:ill;;,",ffi :i'^:',ff 'J:i:;:;;:,,"J;::;:; t to stop payments of cr npensation to the Respondent No.5 and u r"no m ::;l[*i, ffi;:;;::; n: ff ] ffii,]ij i I r :nu"];
Counsel for the petitioners: SRI S. GANESH RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Gp FOR LAND ACe J ,SlTlON Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI NARESH RAJ,
SC FOR AIRPORT AUTHOF ITY
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.S and 6:__-The Court made the following: ORDER
,#
l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.35395 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER: L9.L2.2O25
Between:
Dr.K.Kannaiah, S/o.late Veeraiah & 4 others
...Petitioners
AND
The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others
...Respondents
ORDER:
By addressing a Ietter dated 11.12.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to vvithdraw the writ petition.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a st:quel thereto, miscellaneous appli :ations, if any
.-^ffi
\
pending in this petition, shail stand closed.
*sD/.' . SRINIVASA REDDY A.C I ISTANT RF.G.ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
'._./t.:-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to Sri S. Ganesh Rao, Advocate tOpUCl
4- Two CD Copies
TJ BS M-
HIGH COURT
CC TODAY
DATED:1 911212025
ORDER
,iE S'iAT
C)
oo 'r ? $';t ?t6 .}.
-F'
* .a
I : ;-gn;,r'it L-- !' ,;';"
WP.No.35395 of 2025
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS !1'ITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
V
qo
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. K. Kannaiah
K. Prabhakar
K. Sudhakar
K. Kamalakar
K. Bhaskar
The State of Telangana
N.V.Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
