The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed for quashing an FIR under Sections 342, 504 IPC. The court held the petition infructuous as the corresponding criminal case had already been settled by the Lok Adalat.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3€6J
1
iii I I I II I I
i I I I I I ii iII I ! I Ii I i i I II I tI i i I t Itii
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
. THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEVAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18849 OF 2015
Between:
Dr. Anita Chandna, Wo. Col. Satish Saini, Aged 55years, Occ Doctor, R/o. Plot No. 10, Lakshmi Nagar, Picket, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the FtR No.139 of2O15 dt.21-05-2015 on the file of the Marrdpally PS., Secundeiabad, registered under section 342,504|PCagainst the petitioner herein a illegat, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 ofthe Constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 24359 OF2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstances statedin the affidavit filed in suppgrt of thepetition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to stay al! further proceedings in FIR No.139of 2015, dt. 21-05-2015 registeredon the file of Marredpally PS., Secunderabad against thepetitioner herein, including the arrest of petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.SURYA SATISH Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2: GPFOR HOME -- Gounset for the Respondents No.3 : The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOTTRABLE SRI JUSTICE VAICTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
trRIT PEITITION No.18849 of 2O15
ORDER.:
' Urhen the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Sridhar Bhuvar:agiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, furnished a copy of the case status report with respect to C.C.No.769 of 2025 which arose out of the FIR No. 139 of 2015, dated :21.05.2015, on the file of Marredpalty Police Station, Secunderabad, has already been setfled before the Lok Adalat vide orders dated 08.04.2017 and thus the writ petition has become, infructuous.
2- I: view of the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismisr;ed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI REGISTRAR
,/TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK PSK Qt\L,.
\ \
'i i
HIGH COIURT
DATED:0210912025
THE S
rJ
2 7 FrB tili
*
ORDER
WP.No.18849 of 2015
DISMISSING THE D ETITION WTHOU'T COSTS
l-<sup>rl)A
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of FIR is maintainable in light of resolution by Lok Adalat.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Anita Chandna
The State of Telangana
The Station House Officer, Marredpally Police Station
Miss. Kalyani
Vakati Ramakrishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
