Dismissed¶41

Ch.Jeevan Joel v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Telangana HC6 Feb 2025WP/35031/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Employee transfer challenge; Singareni Collieries Company Limited; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; transfer order Ref.No.CRP/PER/PM1419311675 dated 06-09-2018 by General Manager (Personnel); Section 151 CPC applications; IA No.1 of 2018 suspension of transfer order; IA No.2 of 2018 vacating interim orders dated 01-10-2018; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; Telangana High Court; Justice Pulla Karthik; decided 06-02-2025.

What did the court decide?

On learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that the subject matter of the writ petition has rendered infructuous, the Court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. ¶41

Ch.Jeevan Joel Vs The Chairman and Managing… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 35031 OF 2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

Ch.Jeevan Joel, S/o Jeevaiah, aged 51 years, EC No.287'1253, Occ EP Opertor (Trainee) RG-1 RKNT|ncline, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, No21 -2-1 I, Welgfare Centre, Indian Basthi, Bellampalle, Adilabad District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

I The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Colfieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶13

1. The Director (PA and W), Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶14

1. The General Manager (Personnel) RC, lR and PN/ Singareni Collieries Company Limited,

¶15

1. The Collary Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur, Adilabad District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constttution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 3rd Respondent transferring the petitioner by his Ref.No.CRP/PER/PM1419311675 dated 06-09-2018 is ittegat, arbitrary and contrary to law

¶18

lA NO:^'l OF 2018

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 3rd Respondent in Ref.No.CRPlPENPMl4193l1675 dated 06-09-2018, pending disposal of the above WP pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2018

¶21

Between:

¶22

The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶23

2 f.he Director (PA and W), Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶24

1. The General Manager (Personnel) RC, lR and PI,,1 Singareni Collieries Company Limited,

¶25

The _Collary Manager, Singareni Collieries Compar-ry Limited, Srirampur, Adilabad District.

¶26

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶27

AND

¶28

Ch.Jeevan Joel, S/o Jeevaiah, aged 51 years, EC No.2871253, Occ Ep 9p":1ot^{filainee)_RG-1RKNT|ncline, SingireniCottieriesCompany Limited,} N o21 -2-1 9, Welgfare Centre,lndian Basthi, Bellampalle, Adilabaa Di;trict.

¶29

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶30

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 0'1-10-20'18 passed in lA.No. j of 201g in W.P.No. 35031 of 2018

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN

¶32

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY

¶33

(sc FoR SINGARENt COLt_tERtES CO.LTD)

¶34

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶35

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶36

UIRIT PETITION No. 35O31 of2O18

¶37

ORDER:

¶38

Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in transferring the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed.

¶39

Heard Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri P.Sriharsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondents 1 to 4.

¶40

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has rendered infructuous.

¶41

Recording the above made submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶42

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand ciosed.

¶43

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶44

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY SI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to SRl. CH. VENKAT RAMAN, Advocate PUC] 2 One CC to SRI. P. SRI HARSHA REDDY^(SC FOR INGARENI .> Two COLLIERIES CD CopiesCO.LTD) TOPUC] BM GJP CAL

I ,l

I \

HIGH COURT

DATED:0610212025

ORDER

tHE S I,l ,'6
i{
( o Q^
(
J (
3 0 mnt ZuzS )
r
al
t i),!spArct, cO *
_i:--