Disposed¶38

K.Srinivasa Reddy v. The District Educational Officer

Telangana HC6 Feb 2025WP/12595/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer of S.G.T. during ban period; M.P.P.S. Gullapeta, Jagityal Rural mandal, Jagityal district (old Karimnagar); Proc.Rc.No.5995/A3/2017 dated 07.04.2018 by District Educational Officer; interim order dated 12.04.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018; I.A.No.1 of 2020 to vacate interim order; writ petition disposed of without costs; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; Telangana School Education Department; District Educational Officer; Regional Joint Director of School Education Warangal; Director of School Education.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of on the strength of the interim order dated 12.04.2018 already operating in favour of the petitioner; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stood closed; no order as to costs. ¶38

K.Srinivasa Reddy Vs The District Educational… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 12595 OF 2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

K.Srinivasa Reddy, Wo Ganga Reddy, aged about 44 years, S.G.T., M.P.P.School, Gullapeta, Jagitya Rural mandal, Jagityal district. (Old Karimnagar Dist.)

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The District Educational Officer, Jagityai District. 2 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal,^WarangalDist J The Director of School Education, Govt. of Telangana, at^Hyderabad.

¶13

4 The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary,^{SchoolEducation} Dept., T.S. Secretariat, Hydereabad.

¶14

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature^{of writ} of Mandamus deilare that impugned Proc.Rc.No.5995lA3l2O17^{dt'07.04.2018} issued by the 1st relpondent transferring/d^{isturbing the petitioner frequentlywhen} there is ban on transfers within three^{months,though he joinedat M.P.P.S.} Gullapeta, Mandal Jagityhal Rural,^{as per Proc.Rc.No.5995/A3/2017dt.09-02-} 2O'18 without any valid reason or^{justification is illegaland unjustand quash the} same and consequently hold that^{the petitioner is entitled to be retainedand} continued at M.P.P.S. Gullapeta, Mandal^{Jagityal Rural, as per the ordersdt.09-} 02-2018 of the 1st respondent with all^{consequential benefits}

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶17

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High courtmay be pleased to direct} the respondents to retain and continue^{the petitioneras S.G.T. at M.P'P.S'} Gullapeta by suspending the^{impugned Rc.No.5995/4312017 dt.07.04,2018 issued} by the 1st respondent^{pending disposal of the above W.P.,}

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶19

Between:

¶20

The District E Cucational Officer, Jagityai District.

¶21

The Regiona .,oint Director of School Education, Warangal.^,,A/arangal Dist.

¶22

The Director rf School Education, Govt. of Telangana, at [-yderabad.

¶23

The State of^'li;langana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Scho,tl Education Dept., T S Sr:,rrretariat, Hydereabad.

¶24

...PETITIONE R S/I{ESPONDENTS

¶25

AND

¶26

K.Srinivasa l:R,:ddy, Wo Ganga Reddy, aged about 44 years, S.G.T., N/.P.P.Schoo Gullapeta, Jagitya Rural mandal Jag tyi,rl district. (Old Karimnagar Crist.)

¶27

...RESPONDEI.ITIi/PETITIONERS

¶28

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circurnsrances stated in the affidavit filed ir ;upport of the petition, the High Court nray be,pleased to vacate the interim c'rrler Dated: 12-04-2018 in l.A.No.'1 of ZO1t, ir W.p.No..12595 of 2018 and dismrss t re Writ Petition

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M RAMGOPAL RAO

¶30

Counsel for the Re!;pondents: GP FOR SERVICES I

¶31

The Court made the r tbllowing: ORDER

¶32

THE HON'BLD SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶33

WRIT PETITION No.12595 of2018

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in transferring the petitioner during the ban period, the present writ petition is liled.

¶36

2l Heard Sri M.Ramgopal Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents I to 4.

¶37

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim order passed by this Court ot 12.04.2018, no further orders are required in the present Writ Petition.

¶38

4l Recording the above made submission, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶39

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if^.any, shall stand closed

¶40

There shall be no order as to cos s

¶41

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// I Ihlr, sEcrlSN^{brrlcen I}

¶42

To, 1 The District^{Educational Officer' Jagityai District'} 2 The Director^{of School Education' Govt'of Telangana'at Hyderabad'} a The Principal^{Secretary, School Education Dept ' T'S' Secretariat'} Hyderabad.

a-,6^t

4 The^Region,al '^{lint Director of School Education' Warangal'Wi'rrangal Dist} 5 The Director^{oJ lichool Education, Govt. ofTelangana,at Hyde'abad.} 6 The Principal^{S;€ cretary, School EducationDept'' T S Secre tatiat'} Hyderabad.

¶47