Arragudla Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana

Anagudla Varun Yadav, S/o. Anagudla Yadagiri, Age 24^{yrs Occ Business,} Both Rl/o. Plot No.l141, Survey Nos.11/14, 11115, 11116, 11117 and^11118, Part of Survey No.11, Khanamet (V), Under Chanda Nagar GHMC^Circle, Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Power and Energy Department Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022.

¶13

Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Mdyuth Soudlia, Somajiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.

¶14

The Superintendi ng Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power^Distribution Company Limited ,^{Mdyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.}

¶15

The Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, T G S P DC L, Ranga Reddy' District.

¶16

The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, T G S P DC L,^Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶17

The Assistant Engineer,^{SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur,T G S P D C L,} Ranga Reddy District.

¶18

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner. Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶19

a

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in

¶22

not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, plot No.1141,in,survey Nos.1 1114, 11r1s, 11116, 11t1r and 11r1g, Part of survey No.11, adrneasuring s00 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (v), Under chanda Nagar GH Mc circre, seriringampary (M), Ranga Reddy District, T'S" bounded by North Plot No.1142 South plot No.1140 East 30 wide Road west^prot No.1152., as irtegar, nuil, void, arbitrary and consequengy direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 7th respondent.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶24

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive the application and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, prot No.1 141, in survey Nos.1 1114, 11r1s, 11116, 11117 & 11t19, part of survey No.11, admeasuring 500 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (v), Under chanda Nagar GHMC circre, seritingampaily (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. ptot No.1142; South: plot No.1140; East: 30'Wide Road; West: plot No. 1152.

¶25

counser for the petitioner : sRr THAKUR ROO'A srNGH

¶26

Counselfor the Respondent No.l : Gp FOR ENERGY

¶27

Gounsetfor Respondents No.2to6: sRt N.'REEDHAR REDD',

¶28

SC FOR TSSPDCL

¶29

counsel for Respondent No.7 : sRr G.MADHUSUDHAN REDD', sc FoR GHM.

¶30

The Court made the foilowing: ORDER

¶31

e

¶32

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶33

WRIT PETITION No.3443O OF 2o25

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Petitioners seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 in not receiving their application for electricity connections to their property bearing Plot No.1141, admeasuring 500 square yards in survey Nos.1Il14, lll15, lll16, llllT and 1ll18, partof survey No.11, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶36

Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Energr on behalf of Respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, Iearned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.7 - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

¶37

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in somewhat siinilar circumstances, while dealing with Writ Petition No. 2Ol2L of 2025, this Court by order dated L4.O7.2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the service connection, subject to the compliance of the statutory I requirements by the petitioner therein, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition q|99-"-

¶38

¶39

z

¶40

Recently, the Honble supreme court in Rajendra Kumar Bantatga a- u-p. Aaas Euam viko.s pqrishadt, in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of d.emolition of struchtres. Relevant for the purpose of this case are:

¶41

"(iv) All the necessary service connections, such as, Electricity, water supply, sewerage connection, etc., shall be given by the service provider / Board to the buildings only after the production of the compretion /^occupation certificate.

¶42

(") Even after ibsuance of completion certificate, deviation / violation if any contrary to the planning permission brought to the notice of the authorit5r immediate steps be taken by the said authorit5r concelned, in accordance with law, against the builder / owner / occupant; and the official, who is responsible for issuance of wrongful completion / occupation certificate shall be proceeded departmentally forthwith.

¶43

(vi) No permission / licence to conduct any business / trade must be given by any authorities including rocal bodies of States /Union Territories in any unauthorised building irrespective of it being residential or commercial building.

¶44

¶45

(vii) The development must be in conformity *itr, th. zonal plan land usage. Any modification to such zonar r{3, and usage must be taken by strictly following

¶46

I zozt scc ontine sc 3767

¶47

:," 5- 'i5;:,-

¶48

the rules in place land in consideration of the larger public interest and the impact on the environment".

¶49

Since in" prayer of the petitioners is to^receivethe application form and release individual service^{connection, this} Court without going into merits of the matter, directs^the respondents to process the application of the^{petitionersand} release individual service connection to the subject^property, subject to the petitioners complying with the directions^{issued by} the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raiendra Kumar^{BarJatga'scase} (supra) and the statutory requirements^prescribed by the^local authorities.

¶50

The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of.^No costs

¶51

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, ,70'"*^{if any,} shall stand closed.

¶52

SD/-^{T. SRIDEVI} ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// N OFFICER To, ent Secretariat, EnergY

¶53

1 +:i""5il{5'EX,",tffl:'.xg"olu"#3'rr1"o

¶54

Southern^Power

¶55

2 I?."r..fi11iliffiI.,"X$ll1[iflJ!:rilJ:i,l"Sb.Ifl^3:81Ha3il3' Hyderabad.

¶56

State Southern^{PowerDistribution}

¶57

1. The s u^p eri^{ntendi ns E nsi n} ?,T,:.t?i^33?l&, guda, Hyderabad

¶58

Com pany Limited,^VidYu

¶59

1. The^{Divisional Engineer' Operation Kondapur'T G S P DC L, Ranga ReddY} District-.

¶60

at

¶61

5.TheAsst.DivisionalEngineer'OperationKondapur'TGSPDCL'Ranga neidY^District.

¶62

6.TheAssistantEngineer'SE/OP/GHYDEastAEOPAllapur'TGSPDCL' Ringa^{ReddYDistrict'}

1

, ...,.t.. ''.;':^

I

rvri

¶67

7' The Commissioner, Greater ^Hyd.erabad Municipar corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga RedOV Oijtriii.^---

¶68

one cc to SRTTHAKUR RoopA srNGH, Advocate. topucl

¶69

Two ccs to Gp FoR ENERGy, High court for the State of rerangana. tourl 10.one cc to sRr N.SREEDHAR REDDY, sc FoR TGSPDCL. topucl 11. one cc to sRr G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMC. topucl 12.Two CD Copies

BSI(PMK

Y|

a

HIGH COURT

DATED i1311112025

t \