M/s.Bhargavi Graphics v. Sri Tejas Nandlal Pawar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged respondents disobeyed orders directing them to continue the petitioner's services. Respondents contended contract renewal was not approved. Court held adjudication in main pending writ petition would provide efficacious relief.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.
What the court decided
t33001
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
coNTEMPT CASE NO: 1OF 2025
Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 ofContempt of C9u(s Act, 1971to punish the Reipondents herein for deliberately and willfully !i:opgln.g.the^ orders bf this Court de]fJd 27t12t2024passed inl.A.No.3 of 2024 in W.P.No.32468 of 2024.
Between:
M/s.Bharoavi Graohics. havinq its office at 1-1-11911lN7MainRoad, Tallagadda' SuryapetRep.by is Managing Director,Mr.S.Srinivasa-Chary, S/o B-ixmaiah, age;C'SZy'eari, Occ. B-usiiessRlo. 1-1-119hlAfiMain Road,Tallagadda. Suryapet, Suryapet District, Telangana.
...Petitioner
AND
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the official respondents deliberately disobeyed interim orders directing the petitioner to be continued.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Bharawi Graphics
- respondent
Sri Tejas Nandlal Pawar
- respondent
Sri K.Shankar
- respondent
Smt. Cholleti Padma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court