The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR as infructuous because the parties had settled the matter before the Lok Adalat and the charge sheet was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
G
f
a
t
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITloNNOI336s4 0F 2016
Between:
...PETITIONERS
!,
AND
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfrled therewith' the High Courtmay be pleased to lssue awrit or order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusor any other appropriatewrit by declaring the FIR No 198/2016 U/S.4OO and420 of l.P C of PoliceStation' Narsampet' WarangalDistrict registered againstthe petitioners as lllegal' arbitrary and un-authorized under law and consequentiallyQuash the FIRNo 198/2016U/S406and 420 of l'P'C'of Police Station,Narsampet,Warangal District against petitroners'
tr
'l
a
tfr
4t
t.A. NOi1oF 2016 PMP. NO:41545 oF 2016
Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circunrr tances stated in the affidavitfiledin supportof the petition'the HighCourt may be pleased stay all furtherproceedings including arrest of the petitionersin FIR No l |8/2016 U/S 406 and 420ofl,P C. of PoliceStation, Narsampet,Warangal District
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRIM'SALEEM
Counselfor the Respondents No'1&2: GP FORHOME
4
The Courtmadethe following:ORDER
4l
9
t
It
THE HOIY'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEITVAS RAO
WRIT PEf,ITION No.33654 OF 2()16
ORDER:
This Writ Petition has been hled seeking toquashthe Crime No.198 of 2016 on the file of Narsampetpolice station, Warangal District.
6
a
a
(
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in theWrit
Petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
! D/-MOHD. ISMAIL DIi, TY REGISI:Bae '
,
I
E TION OFFICER
J.
<sup>o,
A BSK S
,i.
a.
,1.
I
t
f
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912025
ORDER
,rri':' ,1 9,:, . <br>r BI r, i, zIE
r)
.t ,i
-:i: .:i
- ,)-._
>)l
WP.No.33654 of2016
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
\r 1 {
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of FIR survives after the filing of charge sheet and settlement before Lok Adalat?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Karthikeya Traders
Mrs. Vangeti Rasagnya
State of Telangana
Station House Officer, Police Station Narsampet
Deputy General Manager, Zonal office Andhra Bank
Chief Manager, Andhra Bank Narsampet Branch
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
