Petitioners sought quashing of FIR in Crime No. 377 of 2017 of PS Miyapur. During pendency, charge sheet was filed as C.C. No. 306 of 2018; counsel conceded the writ cause did not survive. The High Court closed the writ petition, granting liberty to pursue remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRITPETITIO N o: 12 358 0F 2 017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order to call for recordspertaining to Crime No. 377 of 2017, dt. 31.03.2017 on the file of PS Miyapur , as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law, contrary to Criminal Procedure Code,,l973 and contrary to The S.C. and S.T (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,'1989 and the amendments made to the Act and the Rules made there under and Consequently quash the proceedings in Crime No. 377 of 2017 , dt 31 .03-2017
--7/
l.A" NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 15356 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioners in connection with Crime No. 377 ot 2017 on the file of PS Miyapur, Cyberabad
Gounsel for the Petitioners: SRl. Y. SA SANKALP REP SRI Y. RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI J. SATYA PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
/r /
I
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
UIRIT PETITION No.12358 OF 2OL7
ORDER:
When this matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Y. Sai Sankalp, learned Counsel representing Mr. Y. Ramarao, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in ttre Writ Petition does not sureive on the ground that during t]-e pendency of this Writ Petition, the Investing Officer after conducting investigation filed charge sheet and the same is numbered as C.C. No.3O6 of 2018 and is pending.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. SRI T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGt STRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 9n" 99to SRt. y. RAMA RAO, Advocate [OpUCl 2. one cC to sRt. J. sAryApRASAD,X.iJ6*ILio"ducr 3. rwo ccs to Gp FoR xorr,le',irrg['C;-uii6i'[,LttXii,"r retansana at Hyderabad IOUTI 4. Two CD Coiies'
c,tl, Nllll *r
-l
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10912025
<br>I
I
i 0 JAl$ t0tr
,
ORDER
WP.No.12358 ot 2017
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
I? q/6'
@
,o
{v'
Imadabattuni Venugopala Rao
P. Ravi Kiran
M. Uma Devi
Chaitanya
I. Naga Raju
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
