The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging an interim arrangement order by the Director of Prosecutions, dismissing it as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31661
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 33438 OF 2024
Between:
B. Venkateswara Reddy, S/o. B. Narasimha Reddy Aged about 57 years, Occ Advocate R/o. H. No. 3- 9- 109/2, Central Bank Colony, Road No. 13, Mansurabad, L. B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District
,..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the proceedings. No. 2621A212021, dated 18-1 1-2024 issued by Respondent No. 3 making interim arrangement is null and void and consequently quash the same on such terms and conditions as this Honble Court deems fit and proper.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of operation of proceedings in 2621A21202.1 , dated 1g- 112024, issued by Respondent No. 3, pending disposal of main writ petition on such terms and conditions
fA NO: 1 OF 2025
Between:
...PETITION E RS/RESPONDENTS
AND
B..Venkateswara.Reddy, S/o-. B. Narasimha Reddy Aged about 57 years, Occ Advocate R/o. H. No.3--9- 109/2, Central Bank-Colony, Roa-d No. 13, Mansurabad, L. B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders issued in w.p.No.3343g of 2oz4 dated 28.11.2024 and dismiss the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. L. HARISH Counsel for the Respondent No.l: Gp FOR GENERAL ADMtNISTRATION
(THE ADVOCATE GENERAL)
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to3 : Gp FOR HOME
(THE ADVOCATE GENERAL)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR REVENUE (THE ADVOCATE GENERAL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JuSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 33438 of 2024
ORDER:
[.earned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks permission
of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
any, shall stand closed
//TRUE COPYII
Sd/- P. Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR &
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PVL\k
I )
HIGH COURT
'DATED:1610712025
ORDER
WP.No.33438 of 2024
=-:---<br>,.2, int S, ^,)
/."
L.<br>it -1 ((,(
ltt,
2 ll 0tll 2325 .:-
li .'-
i..2,,
.\ )(
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
,odtn
r&-
X6r
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Venkateswara Reddy
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary Secretariat, at Hyderabad
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
Director, Director of Prosecutions, Telangana State, Hyderabad
District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Telangana State, Hyderabad
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
